Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Definition of 'Spatial Thing' #39

Closed
lvdbrink opened this issue Nov 12, 2015 · 6 comments
Closed

Definition of 'Spatial Thing' #39

lvdbrink opened this issue Nov 12, 2015 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@lvdbrink
Copy link
Contributor

The Basic Geo vocabulary has a class SpatialThing which has a very broad definition. This is not a problem for a lot of use cases. However, for some use cases we might need something more specific.

@lvdbrink
Copy link
Contributor Author

Relates to Expressing spatial data section

@dr-shorthair
Copy link
Collaborator

Assume you will also align with OGC GeoSPARQL.
This includes some critical axioms:

geosparql:Geometry
rdf:type owl:Class ;
rdfs:subClassOf geosparql:SpatialObject ;
owl:disjointWith geosparql:Feature ;
.

@lvdbrink lvdbrink added the bp label Jan 25, 2017
@lvdbrink
Copy link
Contributor Author

lvdbrink commented Apr 5, 2017

See also #212. "Spatial thing" is a glossary term marked with yellow to indicate it needs to be checked.

@6a6d74
Copy link
Contributor

6a6d74 commented Apr 5, 2017

@PeterParslow - just checking you've seen that this is another Glossary review related action; could be worth checking with @lieberjosh

It would be worth indicating that Spatial Thing is not a Geometry ...

@lvdbrink
Copy link
Contributor Author

A lot of recent discussion on the mailing list, see thread

@6a6d74
Copy link
Contributor

6a6d74 commented May 3, 2017

Closing as the BP doc now includes the pertinent details from the email thread referenced above. See PR #781

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants