Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[meta] Publish a new Working Draft #188

Closed
anssiko opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 9 comments
Closed

[meta] Publish a new Working Draft #188

anssiko opened this issue May 3, 2017 · 9 comments
Assignees

Comments

@anssiko
Copy link
Member

anssiko commented May 3, 2017

There has been some substantial changes to the latest Editor's Draft since the previous Working Draft was published, so we should publish a new WD.

@fhirsch @dontcallmedom, should we issue a CfC or just go ahead and publish using the amazing bikeshed echidna integration?

Related question (not blocking this publication): @tobie, where are we in terms of the Level 1 milestone? Has the current list been triaged already (see action-785)? Regardless, I think we want to publish a new WD now and do another publication when the Level 1s have been addressed.

@dontcallmedom
Copy link
Member

no CfC needed from my perspective - there was agreement from the group to auto-publish spec updates a while back

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented May 3, 2017

@dontcallmedom, thanks for the confirmation.

@tobie, could you please cast the bikeshed echidna magic spell?

@fhirsch
Copy link

fhirsch commented May 3, 2017

no CfC needed. Publish Working Drafts early and often.

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented May 9, 2017

@tobie, let's publish immediately after #191 lands. Or better, setup automatic publishing on each commit.

@tobie
Copy link
Member

tobie commented May 9, 2017

Or better, setup automatic publishing on each commit.

See #74

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented May 10, 2017

OK, then let's just publish with your echidna.sh (btw. what does the undocumented --self-contained switch do, I did not use it for other specs, what did I miss?)

@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented May 16, 2017

#191 landed. Should land #190 as well before the new Working Draft publication to make the mitigation strategies sections more complete.

@tobie, I assigned #190 to you and expect it to land soon given you seemed to have a clear vision where you wanted to take it.

@tobie
Copy link
Member

tobie commented May 23, 2017

Blocked on speced/bikeshed#1029.

@tobie tobie closed this as completed in 612064f May 24, 2017
@anssiko
Copy link
Member Author

anssiko commented May 26, 2017

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants