RDF-star Working Group charter proposal

[pchampin]

New charter proposal, reviewers please take note.

Charter Review

RDF-star Working Group Charter

What kind of charter is this? Check the relevant box / remove irrelevant branches.

• New

• New WG
• New IG

No advance notice yet. Note however that the work on the charter has been carried on publicly by the RDF-star "task force" of the RDF-DEV CG.

Communities suggested for outreach:

• RDF-DEV community group at large
• SPARQL 1.2 community group
• JSON-LD working group
• Dataset Exchange working group
• Property Graph Schema Working Group of the Linked Data Benchmark Council (LDBC)

Known or potential areas of concern:

The number of documents to update is quite high. For this reason, the scope of the WG is strictly limited to adding no other feature than RDF-star (for which the CG final report provides a clear plan).

Where would charter proponents like to see issues raised?

https://github.com/w3c/rdf-star-wg-charter/issues

[pchampin]

@wseltzer is there any pre-requisite to make the advance notice to the AC?

[himorin]

i18n agrees with this draft charter. But we would remind that there are several recent developments
on metadata for string in data format, and would want to have conversations with WG.

[pchampin]

@himorin I'm assuming you are referring to this work. We are aware of that.

would want to have conversations with WG

Do you mean the WG once it is formed, or the current CG working on RDF-star? In the latter case, we have a call every 2-3 weeks, the agenda is sent to https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-star/. The next one will be on 25th of March, 4PM CET.

[michael-n-cooper]

No comments from APA.

[samuelweiler]

No comments on security or privacy.

[wseltzer]

Advance notice was sent in March 2022: https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2022Mar/0012.html