You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The Limits Section in the Baggage Propagation document specifies the following:
A platform MUST propagate all list-members up to at least 64 list-members including any list-members added by the platform.
A platform MUST propagate all list-members including any list-members added by the platform if the resulting baggage-string would be 8192 bytes or less. If the resulting baggage-string would be greater than 8192 bytes, some list-members MAY be dropped until the resulting baggage-string is 8192 characters or less.
It isn't clear to me what is expected the following hypothetical scenario:
Baggage has 50 list-members
The baggage-string is 10KB
The first limit specification suggests the entire string must be propagated because it contains less than 64 list-members. OTOH, the second limit specification suggests some list-members MAY be dropped. However, doing so contradicts the first requirement, which is labelled as a MUST.
I don't see any size limit to a list-member the way it is defined, which implies that the suggested hypotetical scenario is possible.
Pracitcally speaking, it seems to me that if there is a limit on length is provided, the intent is to allow an implemenation to bound the resources it would need to process a baggage string, if necessary. So, this leads me to believe the intent is to allow the size limit to trump the number of list-members limit.
I'm looking for feedback to confirm my thinking on this. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The Limits Section in the Baggage Propagation document specifies the following:
It isn't clear to me what is expected the following hypothetical scenario:
The first limit specification suggests the entire string must be propagated because it contains less than 64 list-members. OTOH, the second limit specification suggests some list-members MAY be dropped. However, doing so contradicts the first requirement, which is labelled as a MUST.
I don't see any size limit to a list-member the way it is defined, which implies that the suggested hypotetical scenario is possible.
Pracitcally speaking, it seems to me that if there is a limit on length is provided, the intent is to allow an implemenation to bound the resources it would need to process a baggage string, if necessary. So, this leads me to believe the intent is to allow the size limit to trump the number of list-members limit.
I'm looking for feedback to confirm my thinking on this. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: