Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude TAG/AB from voting on their own decisions/proposals. #749 #761

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 11, 2023

Conversation

fantasai
Copy link
Collaborator

@fantasai fantasai commented May 19, 2023

There are two variants possible: see bracketed text, which could be kept or removed.

(Personally, I prefer removing it, for simplicity; but could live with either way.)


Preview | Diff

@dwsinger
Copy link
Contributor

The bracketed text I think needs to say (if we keep it) "those who were members of the group when the decision was made are excluded from any vote" (it's possible someone left the TAG and joined the AB, for example). It's complex, but I think it gives the correct appearance – those who made the decision against which the FO was filed can't vote. But it also opens many cans of worms – what if an AB or TAG member was a chair of a group, or the primary editor? It also ignores the possibility that the group was divided on the original decision. Overall, I would go without this bracketed text: there are too many corner cases.

@fantasai fantasai added the Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call label May 23, 2023
index.bs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Agenda+ Marks issues that are ready for discussion on the call labels Oct 11, 2023
@frivoal frivoal added this to the P2024 milestone Oct 11, 2023
@frivoal frivoal merged commit 1ef2a59 into w3c:main Oct 11, 2023
2 checks passed
@nabilaljordan
Copy link

fantasai:council-self-exclusion

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants