Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Removal of SC 3.2.7: Visible Controls from WCAG 2.2. #3587

Closed
Ohadha-bobly opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

Removal of SC 3.2.7: Visible Controls from WCAG 2.2. #3587

Ohadha-bobly opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 3 comments

Comments

@Ohadha-bobly
Copy link

Why was SC 3.2.7: Visible Controls scrapped from WCAG 2.2?

@alastc
Copy link
Contributor

alastc commented Dec 5, 2023

Approved response from the group:


Visible Controls was in earlier drafts, but it was somewhere between difficult and impossible to define what would pass and fail such a criterion in a binary way.

Even relatively common interface examples (such as a play media button) may be difficult to evaluate as they are often expected to disappear. Also, as different people have different expectations of interfaces there is no one-rule you can make which captures (or cuts through) the complexity.

We tested some examples, and there were enough that had very different results between testers that we couldn't continue.

We think this was the last couple of meeting minutes on the topic:
https://www.w3.org/2022/04/05-ag-minutes#item09
https://www.w3.org/2022/04/26-ag-minutes#t06

It is up for discussion again as part of WCAG 3, which should have other ways of evaluating interfaces to make it more possible.

@bruce-usab
Copy link
Contributor

@Ohadha-bobly -- please close this issue if the "draft response for review" is enough of an explanation.

@alastc
Copy link
Contributor

alastc commented Jan 31, 2024

This response was approved by the group, so closing.

@alastc alastc closed this as completed Jan 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants