Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Align Vocabulary tables with TD spec #73

Closed
egekorkan opened this issue Jul 28, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

Align Vocabulary tables with TD spec #73

egekorkan opened this issue Jul 28, 2019 · 3 comments
Labels
Editorial

Comments

@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor

As a continuation of #61, in the binding spec, the vocabulary tables are structured in a different way to the TD spec. Since protocol bindings are an extension the TD vocabulary, they should look the same and be consistent. Thanks @takuki !
@egekorkan egekorkan mentioned this issue Jul 28, 2019
Closed
@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Started fixing in #79

@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor Author

In the Web meeting of 25.10.2019 we have agreed on removing the default values from the vocabulary tables. Then there needs to be a table for each protocol detailing how op keywords map to form instance contents such as protocol options, subprotocol etc.

egekorkan added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 10, 2019
@egekorkan
fix for issues #72, #78, #73
3b8be80
@egekorkan
Copy link
Contributor Author

Fixed in #79

@egekorkan egekorkan mentioned this issue Nov 10, 2019
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Editorial
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@egekorkan