-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 63
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Validation of extensions and fetching from context URLs #1181
Comments
Need to define:
|
Another point: |
I think this will be hard to be done in the @context of a JSON-LD file. Can't we have a field that is an array for the shapes and another for the schemas which content of both is a set of URLs where to find the documents (schemas or shapes) ? |
I have been looking for a specification of how SHACL files are supposed to be distributed. I haven't found anything but do understand there is a convention so if anyone has information on that it would be great, or knows of a contact we can ask... |
Anyway, my general thought was that we would not ADD new things to
We could also do both. |
It would be useful to have a convention to relate context URLs to validation files, including JSON Schemas and SHACL, in addition to ontology files. Also, we should set up the context URLs so that fetching from them produces actual ontology definitions (at least) and our "baseline" context URLs should also satisfy the conventions suggested (via SHOULD) for extensions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: