Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Increase exchange transaction fee #245

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 17, 2017

Conversation

koloale
Copy link
Contributor

@koloale koloale commented Apr 17, 2017

No description provided.

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #245 into version-0.6.0 will decrease coverage by 0.04%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@                Coverage Diff                @@
##           version-0.6.0     #245      +/-   ##
=================================================
- Coverage          83.16%   83.12%   -0.05%     
=================================================
  Files                158      158              
  Lines               4254     4254              
  Branches             421      421              
=================================================
- Hits                3538     3536       -2     
- Misses               716      718       +2
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../main/scala/scorex/network/NetworkController.scala 81.03% <0%> (-1.73%) ⬇️
...c/main/scala/scorex/network/peer/PeerManager.scala 86.84% <0%> (-1.32%) ⬇️
...ex/consensus/mining/BlockGeneratorController.scala 83.09% <0%> (+1.4%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update cc7637b...bdba191. Read the comment docs.

@alexeykiselev alexeykiselev merged commit 9e60118 into version-0.6.0 Apr 17, 2017
@alexeykiselev alexeykiselev deleted the Increase_exchange_transaction_fee branch April 17, 2017 13:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants