Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update Safari Technology Preview to 99 #21359

Conversation

autofoolip
Copy link
Contributor

Version as reported by safaridriver --version:
Included with Safari Technology Preview (Release 99, 14610.1.1)

Source: https://developer.apple.com/safari/download/
Build: https://dev.azure.com/foolip/safari-technology-preview-updater/_build/results?buildId=1310&view=logs

Version as reported by safaridriver --version:
Included with Safari Technology Preview (Release 99, 14610.1.1)

Source: https://developer.apple.com/safari/download/
Build: https://dev.azure.com/foolip/safari-technology-preview-updater/_build/results?buildId=1310&view=logs
@foolip foolip force-pushed the safari-technology-preview-99 branch from 62e36f5 to 1af4fde Compare January 23, 2020 03:44
@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Jan 23, 2020

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Jan 23, 2020

https://wpt.fyi/results/?diff&filter=ADC&run_id=416830016&run_id=393600011 shows significant regressions in pointerevents/ and webdriver/. @burg it looks like there might be a safaridriver regression here.

A bunch of tests in /infrastructure/testdriver/actions now appear as CRASH, although I doubt there's actually a crash here. I think I'll need to revive #18444 to debug this.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Jan 23, 2020

In #21369 I went over the verbose logs and filed https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206646 based on that.

This appears serious enough that we shouldn't upgrade to STP 99, since it breaks more tests than it fixes. However, the run does finish, so if WebKit folks things having the results is still useful, we could merge this.

@burg @smfr WDYT?

@gsnedders
Copy link
Member

From @burg in the WebKit bug:

Unfortunately there is no workaround for this issue in STP99.

@foolip
Copy link
Member

foolip commented Feb 6, 2020

PR for STP 100 is up now: #21627

@foolip foolip closed this Feb 6, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants