Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Units: Giant Ant advances to Soldier Ant #7274

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 12, 2023

Conversation

knyghtmare
Copy link
Member

Adds the missing advancement, unless there is argument that soldier ants and worker (Giant) ants should be different unit-lines as Darwinism goes.

@knyghtmare knyghtmare added Enhancement Issues that are requests for new features or changes to existing ones. Units Issues that involve unit definitions or their implementation in the engine. labels Jan 12, 2023
advances_to=null
{AMLA_DEFAULT}
cost=14
cost=16
usage=fighter
description= _ "Giant Ants are common in almost any environment, from caverns deep under the earth to the tops of tall mountains. Most common are the nondescript workers and scouts, but in times of conflict, a more dangerous Soldier caste enters the fray."
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If L0 workers can turn into soldiers then this description would need changes.

Personally, having the workers and soldiers as different castes sounds more interesting, although it wouldn't fit the game mechanics so well.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Personally, having the workers and soldiers as different castes sounds more interesting, although it wouldn't fit the game mechanics so well.

Given the unit visual similarity (sprite+portraits), players/umc-authors expect an advancement to be present. This is game mechanics.

However, I think to resolve this, maybe we can add a secondary advancement to Giant Ant titled "Worker Ant".
Worker Ants would be weaker but tankier since they dont fight but rather work for the development of the ant colony.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does that make them tankier? It's the soldier ants who should be tanky. Maybe make the worker ants faster instead? So, they do less damage but have more MP. They're not built for fighting, but they're better at running away.

@spixi spixi mentioned this pull request Jan 27, 2023
@spixi
Copy link
Contributor

spixi commented Jan 27, 2023

When we have a Soldier and a Worker caste, maybe we can also have a winged Drone caste (fragile scout unit).

@knyghtmare
Copy link
Member Author

Suggesting new units is fine, but I think there is zero effort in attracting new pixel artists which is the underlying real problem which nobody seems to notice...

@Pentarctagon Pentarctagon merged commit b8b4027 into wesnoth:master Feb 12, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement Issues that are requests for new features or changes to existing ones. Units Issues that involve unit definitions or their implementation in the engine.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants