Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Load atwho and caret explicitly in main with require #585

Merged
merged 19 commits into from
Nov 6, 2014
Merged

Load atwho and caret explicitly in main with require #585

merged 19 commits into from
Nov 6, 2014

Conversation

willzeng
Copy link
Owner

@willzeng willzeng commented Nov 6, 2014

@davidfurlong This seems to improve things on production as I have not gotten the error on atwho after making this change.

Addresses #578

I did once see the error with bbmodal that you mentioned and am thinking of trying this same fix with it, but have run into some other weird bugs that get introduced.

In any case, see if this works to fix the atwho bug for you. This is the branch that is currently on http://www.cograph.co/

davidfurlong added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 6, 2014
Load atwho and caret explicitly in main with require
@davidfurlong davidfurlong merged commit be422cf into dev Nov 6, 2014
@willzeng
Copy link
Owner Author

willzeng commented Nov 6, 2014

Does it seem to eliminate the bug for you as well?

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 6:57 AM, David Furlong notifications@github.com
wrote:

Merged #585.

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#585 (comment)

@davidfurlong
Copy link
Collaborator

Does it seem to eliminate the bug for you as well?

Ay. But the modal bug remains

@willzeng
Copy link
Owner Author

willzeng commented Nov 7, 2014

YES!! I will take a similar approach and start fixing the bbmodal (though the naive extention of just requiring bbmodal and its deps reintroduced new bugs)

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:25 AM, David Furlong notifications@github.com
wrote:

Does it seem to eliminate the bug for you as well?

Ay. But the modal bug remains

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#585 (comment)

@willzeng willzeng deleted the new branch January 31, 2015 17:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants