Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Why not proof.py? #8

Closed
NiklasRosenstein opened this issue Sep 10, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Why not proof.py? #8

NiklasRosenstein opened this issue Sep 10, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@NiklasRosenstein
Copy link

Any reason the library is a package and not a single Python module?

@onyxfish
Copy link
Collaborator

To be honest, I never considered doing it another way, but if I needed a reason it's because I like to have the flexibility to divide classes into separate modules as the code base matures and becomes more complex.

Is there a particular reason you were prefer it to be packaged as a module?

@NiklasRosenstein
Copy link
Author

Just a personal preference, keeping tight things tight. Was wondering if you had a special reason other than personal preference. ;)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants