-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create a "splice" type #185
Comments
Have you considered the Would the following example work for you? connectors:
S: &splice # generic autogenerated splice
style: simple
autogenerate: true
type: splice
S1:
<<: *splice # copy attributes from 'S'
autogenerate: false # but disable autogeneration
show_name: false # this is currently necessary when autogenerate == false
cables:
W1:
wirecount: 3
color_code: DIN
W2:
wirecount: 4
color_code: IEC
connections:
-
- W1: [1-3]
- [S, S, S1] # wires 1+2 use autogenerated splice connectors
# wire 3 uses splice connector with user-specified designator
- W2: [1-3]
-
- S1 # reuse S1 for the three-way splice
- W2: 4 See #184 for ongoing work on improving auto-generated connectors. |
@MSBGit |
Sometimes I have one wire harness that is spliced to another wire harness (usually inside an enclosure for example). The splice is just wires soldered together and then heatshrinked, there is no physical connector at the splice. It would be useful to have a splice type which functions like a connector but doesn't have pins or other connector attributes and would be rendered as one or more wires joining one or more other wires, but not in any type of "housing". Today, I create a splice connector and use that to do what I want but it's confusing when someone looks at my wiring diagram and sees what looks like a connector but doesn't find a physical connector anywhere in the system (even though I comment the
yml
file when I define such a splice).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: