We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As a user, I'd like to store data more efficiently than geojson
As a user, I'd like to read networks in less time that it takes to go get coffee
Binary data formats such as feather or parquet (compressed version of feather)
Advantage:
links.json
links.parquet
Parquet actually slowed read the read speed (!?!?):
?? Did I do something wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This was implemented in v1.0-alpha.1 release and will be closed by v1.0 PR
Sorry, something went wrong.
Fixed in v1
No branches or pull requests
As a user, I'd like to store data more efficiently than geojson
As a user, I'd like to read networks in less time that it takes to go get coffee
Potential Solutions
Binary data formats such as feather or parquet (compressed version of feather)
Advantage:
links.json
: 1.33 GB >>>links.parquet
: 508 MB)Reading speed
Parquet actually slowed read the read speed (!?!?):
?? Did I do something wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: