We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As a user and developer I'd like to use consistent terms throughout the network wrangler API, including node vs nodes and link vs links
node
nodes
link
links
Right now project cards use link and node to describe a facility selection but links and nodes to describe new or deleted links.
facility
Since it is more accurate to describe these as plural lists, consistently implement links and nodes throughout the API and data spec.
Medium
Low (already done)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Fixed in #327
Sorry, something went wrong.
e-lo
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
User Story
As a user and developer I'd like to use consistent terms throughout the network wrangler API, including
nodevsnodesandlinkvslinksStatus
Context
Right now project cards use
linkandnodeto describe afacilityselection butlinksandnodesto describe new or deleted links.Resolution Ideas
Since it is more accurate to describe these as plural lists, consistently implement
linksandnodesthroughout the API and data spec.Priority
Medium
Level of Effort
Low (already done)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: