This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 12, 2023. It is now read-only.
Use explicit unused bytes instead of inferred for most padding #96
Labels
bug
Something isn't working
good first issue
Good for newcomers
help wanted
Extra attention is needed
question
Further information is requested
task
An essential task for a planned milestone.
I think as a general code style rule, it is clearer to write:
rather than:
I asked for some feedback for this from friends, and the first was strongly preferred for clarity and readability.
Unresolved questions
Should unused bytes for filling up to the minimum message limits be explicit, or stay as inferred? I'm leaning towards inferred, but feel free to discuss.
Inferred
Explicit
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: