Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

32 _bits_? #1

Closed
bburky opened this issue Dec 15, 2013 · 4 comments
Closed

32 _bits_? #1

bburky opened this issue Dec 15, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@bburky
Copy link
Collaborator

bburky commented Dec 15, 2013

As great as the pun is, calling it 32 bits is possibly pushing it.

If someone manages to shorten the code will you have to rename the repo? That said I'm not sure how this can be shortened.
@xem
Copy link
Owner

xem commented Dec 15, 2013

oh god. Thanks for seeing that.
unintended pun.
I'll fix the readme, but won't rename the repo, because 'b' can stand for 'byte' ;)
and if someone makes it smaller, the repo's name will mean "fits in 32b" instead of "exactly 32b"

@xem xem closed this as completed Dec 15, 2013
@xem
Copy link
Owner

xem commented Dec 15, 2013

by the way, an arbitrary code editor CAN be smaller (28b):

<body onload=eval(prompt())>

but it's not URL-based =(

@bburky
Copy link
Collaborator Author

bburky commented Dec 15, 2013

Ah, that would work. I suppose it depends on how you define it.

@xem
Copy link
Owner

xem commented Dec 15, 2013

by the way, an url-based arbitrary code editor CAN be smaller (0b)

(no code at all)

just visit:

data:text/html,<body onload=alert(1)>

so the "32 bits" isn't that much finally =)

@xem xem mentioned this issue Dec 15, 2013
Closed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@bburky @xem