-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
backbone #6
Comments
No, we use a 2D version of V-Net for train_diffusion_2d.py by directly changing the Conv3D to Conv2D. |
Thank you very much for your reply. I want to compare your code as a baceline. I used unet as the backbone before, so I want to replace your backbone with unet. Do you think it is feasible? Or if I directly use your training results for comparison, is it unfair that the backbone is different? |
Sure, it is very easy to change the backbone to unet, I can also give you a rough example in the attachment as reference (may exist bugs). Furthermore, I've also tried unet before, but there's no big difference, so you may also use the results directly, I think it's fine. |
Thank you very much, I will try the method you shared to change backbone to unet. I would like to ask, do you still have the results of using unet as the backbone to train on the M&MS data set? If so, can you share it? |
Sorry, I did not save the results😅. |
OK, thank you very much for your patient answer. |
Hello, I conducted an experiment on the m&ms data set according to the DiffUNet.txt you provided. I can achieve an accuracy of about 72% on 2% of the D domain, and an accuracy of about 69% on the 2% of the A domain. , the effect is very different from what you said. I would like to ask if you set some specific parameters when using unet as backbone training? |
Hi, thank you for sharing the code. Does your train_diffusion_2d.py use unet as the backbone?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: