-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dev RFC: MapUnit and automated - doc and roadmap? #11841
Comments
Automated units are supposed to have only "automated true" set, not the action - this is so that automated units can have a state, like "set up", "fortified", etc, without taking them out of automation |
So UnitActionType.ConnectRoad isn't supposed to be treated as automated? |
ConnectRoad is a specific action we ask the unit to do. You could consider that automation or not, that's semantics. |
Then the connect road code is bugged in a minor way - perfect, all perceived inconsistencies explained. |
This issue is stale because it has been open 90 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 15 days. |
This issue was closed because it has been stalled for 5 days with no activity. |
Problem Description
The
action
andautomated
fields of MapUnit lack documentation and clarity. I tried to encapsulate - make just the set private, replace with accessors, and build a Kdoc from there - and gave up - I don't know all ramifications, and deducting them from code is effort.Code places to look into
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: