You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, your work is really inspiring and I have one question.
In the paper, you were saying the model would be more robust when facing large-scale graph data and corrupted adjacency information, as it utilizes the adjacency information implicitly, rather like GCN which uses adjacency information directly during the information aggregation phase.
However, I am wondering you still use the adjacency information (even multiply 4 times is possible: 4th power of adj) in calculation Ncontrast Loss, how would this maintain robust performance with massive corrupted adjacency information, given you still need the adjacency information in Ncontrast loss in training?
Is that becuase you only need adjacency information during training rather than both train and test phase? Or some other reason to justify?
I am really confused about that and look forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks. Is my understanding correct that difference between the performance of the Graph-MLP and GCN, is mainly due to no adjacency information utilized in the test phase of Graph-MLP?
Hi, your work is really inspiring and I have one question.
In the paper, you were saying the model would be more robust when facing large-scale graph data and corrupted adjacency information, as it utilizes the adjacency information implicitly, rather like GCN which uses adjacency information directly during the information aggregation phase.
However, I am wondering you still use the adjacency information (even multiply 4 times is possible: 4th power of adj) in calculation Ncontrast Loss, how would this maintain robust performance with massive corrupted adjacency information, given you still need the adjacency information in Ncontrast loss in training?
Is that becuase you only need adjacency information during training rather than both train and test phase? Or some other reason to justify?
I am really confused about that and look forward to your reply.
Thanks a lot
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: