Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rubocop update #478

Merged
merged 55 commits into from
Jul 15, 2016
Merged

Rubocop update #478

merged 55 commits into from
Jul 15, 2016

Conversation

lslezak
Copy link
Member

@lslezak lslezak commented Jun 17, 2016

This is a preview for Rubocop update, let's see and discuss the changes.

Note: The commits Manually fixed ... were fixed manually (and thus deserve extra careful review), the rest was fixed automatically Rubocop.

See also yast/yast-devtools#107

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 50.696% when pulling 95477b6 on rubocop_update into 905a522 on master.

@@ -856,7 +856,7 @@ def Run(widgets, functions, skip_store_for: [])

next if ret.nil?

ret = nil if !validateWidgets(widgets, event_descr) if save
ret = nil if save && (!validateWidgets(widgets, event_descr))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍 it was actually from my POV style bug of ruby conversion

@jreidinger
Copy link
Member

reviewed till "Manually fixed Style/GuardClause" now need to look at L3 for a moment.

@lslezak lslezak changed the title [WIP] Rubocop update Rubocop update Jul 15, 2016
@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 50.682% when pulling 981af5f on rubocop_update into b910018 on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.2%) to 50.682% when pulling 4a83c5f on rubocop_update into b910018 on master.

@jreidinger
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@lslezak lslezak merged commit 562e2f3 into master Jul 15, 2016
@lslezak lslezak deleted the rubocop_update branch November 30, 2016 07:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants