Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

TimedFunc.java:38-41: Avoid usage of null value in... #887

Closed
0pdd opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 16 comments
Closed

TimedFunc.java:38-41: Avoid usage of null value in... #887

0pdd opened this issue May 19, 2018 · 16 comments

Comments

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator

0pdd commented May 19, 2018

The puzzle 861-703fedf3 from #861 has to be resolved:

* @todo #861:30min Avoid usage of null value in ctor(Proc, long) which is
* against design principles.
* Perhaps in creating TimedProc?
* Please take a look on #551 and #843 for more details.

The puzzle was created by Isammoc OFF on 16-May-18.

Estimate: 30 minutes,

If you have any technical questions, don't ask me, submit new tickets instead. The task will be "done" when the problem is fixed and the text of the puzzle is removed from the source code. Here is more about PDD and about me.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 19, 2018

@llorllale/z please, pay attention to this issue

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented May 19, 2018

Job #887 is now in scope, role is DEV

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jun 29, 2018

The job #887 assigned to @victornoel/z, here is why; the budget is 30 minutes, see §4; please, read §8 and §9; if the task is not clear, read this and this; there will be a monetary reward for this job

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jul 4, 2018

@victornoel/z this job was assigned to you 5days ago. It will be taken away from you soon, unless you close it, see §8. Read this and this, please.

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@0crat wait I'm working on this, see #918 for discussions on the matter.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Jul 4, 2018

@0crat wait I'm working on this, see #918 for discussions on the matter. (here)

@victornoel The impediment for #887 was registered successfully by @victornoel/z

victornoel added a commit to victornoel/cactoos that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2018
@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@0pdd this is fixed in #926.

@0pdd
Copy link
Collaborator Author

0pdd commented Sep 20, 2018

The puzzle 861-703fedf3 has disappeared from the source code, that's why I closed this issue.

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 20, 2018

@elenavolokhova/z please review this job completed by @victornoel/z, as in §30; the job will be fully closed and all payments will be made when the quality review is completed

@0crat 0crat removed the scope label Sep 20, 2018
@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 20, 2018

The job #887 is now out of scope

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@elenavolokhova any way to get QA for this? thanks :)

@elenavolokhova
Copy link

@0crat quality good

@elenavolokhova
Copy link

@victornoel sorry for delay...

@victornoel
Copy link
Collaborator

@elenavolokhova no problem, thanks :)

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 27, 2018

Order was finished, quality is "good": +35 point(s) just awarded to @victornoel/z

@0crat
Copy link
Collaborator

0crat commented Sep 27, 2018

Quality review completed: +8 point(s) just awarded to @elenavolokhova/z

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants