Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Abstract classes must have prefix Abstract #69

Closed
xepozz opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Abstract classes must have prefix Abstract #69

xepozz opened this issue Oct 6, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@xepozz
Copy link
Member

xepozz commented Oct 6, 2020

PSR Naming Conventions says:

Abstract classes MUST be prefixed by Abstract: e.g. Psr\Foo\AbstractBar.

I think we need to fix it in the same way as interface naming conventions is fixed

@samdark
Copy link
Member

samdark commented Aug 23, 2021

PSR naming conventions are not about userland code style, they are about code style to use in PSR documents. We currently do not prefix abstract classes and I see no need to do so.

@samdark samdark closed this as completed Aug 23, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants