You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'm looking to replicate the results for the other visual genome scene graph evaluation modes. To get the test results under your evaluation, I would need to run something like the following, right?
Hierarchical_Descriptive_Model.evaluate throws an error when use_gt_boxes=True because im_info is a 1 x 3 tensor. I got the best results when I uncommented the division by the image scale (which makes sense as then the GT boxes are at the same scale as the ROI proposals), can you confirm that e.g. gt_boxes_object = gt_objects[:, :4] is right?
However, even when I did these things, I can't match your paper results for PredCls and PhrCls. For PredCls for instance, I get around 37% R@50 and 46% R@50. Is there something else you did to get these numbers?
Thanks! -Rowan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Yikang,
I'm looking to replicate the results for the other visual genome scene graph evaluation modes. To get the test results under your evaluation, I would need to run something like the following, right?
I had to change a couple of things too:
Hierarchical_Descriptive_Model.evaluate throws an error when
use_gt_boxes=True
because im_info is a 1 x 3 tensor. I got the best results when I uncommented the division by the image scale (which makes sense as then the GT boxes are at the same scale as the ROI proposals), can you confirm that e.g.gt_boxes_object = gt_objects[:, :4]
is right?https://github.com/yikang-li/MSDN/blob/master/faster_rcnn/MSDN.py#L118 seems like it contains a bug, because only the top couple of ROIs are overwritten. Can you confirm that it should be changed to
object_rois = object_rois_gt
?However, even when I did these things, I can't match your paper results for PredCls and PhrCls. For PredCls for instance, I get around 37% R@50 and 46% R@50. Is there something else you did to get these numbers?
Thanks! -Rowan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: