Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Command name could be shorter for faster typing #9

Open
yunbinmo opened this issue Apr 16, 2022 · 1 comment
Open

Command name could be shorter for faster typing #9

yunbinmo opened this issue Apr 16, 2022 · 1 comment

Comments

@yunbinmo
Copy link
Owner

yunbinmo commented Apr 16, 2022

The command names could be shortened so that fast typists can perform the task more quickly. E.g. editClient could be editC

@nus-pe-bot
Copy link

nus-pe-bot commented Apr 19, 2022

Team's Response

This report has the same notion of command names that could be improved. While somewhat valid, it is rejected as a few extra characters do not matter to a fast typist.

The 'Original' Bug

[The team marked this bug as a duplicate of the following bug]

Hard-to-type command format

addClient could be addC, addNote could be addN and addPref could be addP.


[original: nus-cs2103-AY2122S2/pe-interim#587] [original labels: severity.Low type.FeatureFlaw]

Their Response to the 'Original' Bug

[This is the team's response to the above 'original' bug]

While the command could be shortened, it reduces the intuitiveness of the command for the user, as Client is not immediately apparent from C

Items for the Tester to Verify

❓ Issue duplicate status

Team chose to mark this issue as a duplicate of another issue (as explained in the Team's response above)

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


❓ Issue response

Team chose [response.Rejected]

  • I disagree

Reason for disagreement: [replace this with your explanation]


Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants