Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add BreakWhen method #15

Closed
GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 25, 2015 · 3 comments
Closed

Add BreakWhen method #15

GoogleCodeExporter opened this issue Dec 25, 2015 · 3 comments

Comments

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link

There are some nice Assert methods to simplify assertion but it would also 
be nice to specify breakpoints in a similar manner for use when debugging 
problems. It would certainly be easier than adding conditional breakpoints.

Original issue reported on code.google.com by jeffma...@gmail.com on 10 Mar 2009 at 10:11

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

I realise this is slightly (okay, maybe grossly) outside the intentions of this 
project but it just seems like such a nice simple method to add that could aid 
in the 
debugging of some rather annoying collection problems that would otherwise 
require 
some stress with the breakpoint condition dialog.

Original comment by jeffma...@gmail.com on 11 Mar 2009 at 9:36

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

In hindsight, I'm not convinced anymore.  I don't know why I didn't consider 
it, but 
is it really worth going to this effort when all one needs to write is:

from x in myCollection
where MyBreakpointCondition(x)
Debugger.Break()

?

Original comment by jeffma...@gmail.com on 17 Mar 2009 at 3:44

@GoogleCodeExporter
Copy link
Author

> outside the intentions of this project

I would say so too.

> I'm not convinced anymore.

In that case, closing for now.

Original comment by azizatif on 4 Apr 2009 at 7:28

  • Changed state: WontFix
  • Added labels: Type-Enhancement
  • Removed labels: Type-Defect

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant