You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I noted today that the "fallback_interface" option needs to be added on BOOTH sides, not just at the client-side.
In my case i had massive latency and performance issues in the downstream path, bot upstream was fine.
after i have set fallback =1 at booth eds the LTE interface is really in standard for up/dl.
REQUEST:
It is possible to add the TCP tunnel option (back) ?
i use vtun since more then 15 years with TCP instead UDP protocol. this has the huge advantage that i no longer need the chaotic workarounds for MTU/MSS/PMTU and i can setup up tunnels straight with an MTU of 1500 like before. By using tcp the protocol itself handle all fragmentation issues just between client and server. Basicly i have less problems with specific firewalls or in scenarios where udp is filtered or not optimal to use.
Or can we think about a solution to handle internaly an MTU of 1500 with UDP by fragmenting directly in MLVPN so the tunnel accept the fully standard packet size ?
Another open thing is the time in which a "lossy" link is reused/retryed. At the moment there is no config option set a reusable/retry value. IN my scenario one of my link reached a 10% trigger and goes down - but not comes back byself after a while.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I noted today that the "fallback_interface" option needs to be added on BOOTH sides, not just at the client-side.
In my case i had massive latency and performance issues in the downstream path, bot upstream was fine.
after i have set fallback =1 at booth eds the LTE interface is really in standard for up/dl.
REQUEST:
It is possible to add the TCP tunnel option (back) ?
i use vtun since more then 15 years with TCP instead UDP protocol. this has the huge advantage that i no longer need the chaotic workarounds for MTU/MSS/PMTU and i can setup up tunnels straight with an MTU of 1500 like before. By using tcp the protocol itself handle all fragmentation issues just between client and server. Basicly i have less problems with specific firewalls or in scenarios where udp is filtered or not optimal to use.
Or can we think about a solution to handle internaly an MTU of 1500 with UDP by fragmenting directly in MLVPN so the tunnel accept the fully standard packet size ?
Another open thing is the time in which a "lossy" link is reused/retryed. At the moment there is no config option set a reusable/retry value. IN my scenario one of my link reached a 10% trigger and goes down - but not comes back byself after a while.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: