Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fallback-config bug/documentation & tcp tunnel support #148

Open
Himan2001 opened this issue Jan 10, 2021 · 0 comments
Open

fallback-config bug/documentation & tcp tunnel support #148

Himan2001 opened this issue Jan 10, 2021 · 0 comments

Comments

@Himan2001
Copy link

I noted today that the "fallback_interface" option needs to be added on BOOTH sides, not just at the client-side.
In my case i had massive latency and performance issues in the downstream path, bot upstream was fine.
after i have set fallback =1 at booth eds the LTE interface is really in standard for up/dl.

REQUEST:
It is possible to add the TCP tunnel option (back) ?

i use vtun since more then 15 years with TCP instead UDP protocol. this has the huge advantage that i no longer need the chaotic workarounds for MTU/MSS/PMTU and i can setup up tunnels straight with an MTU of 1500 like before. By using tcp the protocol itself handle all fragmentation issues just between client and server. Basicly i have less problems with specific firewalls or in scenarios where udp is filtered or not optimal to use.

Or can we think about a solution to handle internaly an MTU of 1500 with UDP by fragmenting directly in MLVPN so the tunnel accept the fully standard packet size ?

Another open thing is the time in which a "lossy" link is reused/retryed. At the moment there is no config option set a reusable/retry value. IN my scenario one of my link reached a 10% trigger and goes down - but not comes back byself after a while.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant