Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exploring the transposition profile of specific LTRs #54

Open
shuren7 opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Exploring the transposition profile of specific LTRs #54

shuren7 opened this issue Apr 9, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@shuren7
Copy link

shuren7 commented Apr 9, 2024

Dear Professor Zhang, @zhangrengang
I apologize for disturbing you in your busy schedule. I know that LTR_Retriever and TEsorter are paired together, but the author of LTR_Retriever, Shujun Ou, seems to be very busy these days, so there's a question I'm concerned about that I think I have to ask you.

The issue I am most concerned about is the issue regarding the determination of the number of transpositions for a specific LTR-RT. And how to identify the parent or child of a specific LTR? Quantitative expression of some LTRs by TEtranscripts indicates that they are active LTRs, but I am curious how many times they have undergone transposition in a single genome. Please note that I am currently only targeting a single genome.

This involves the issue of LTR_retriever result files. What I don't quite understand is what "LTRlib.redundant.fa" specifically refers to, and I can't find an explanation in many places. Does "reduntant" refer to all existing LTRs? And "LTRlib.fa" refers to representative LTRs after removing duplicates?

I think this involves the search for the mother of LTRs. Because I focus on the possible origins of specific LTRs and "how many copies it has formed in the genome"; especially highly active LTRs and their transposition patterns.

I tried to use BLASTN to find the parent of individual LTRs (not sure if it is correct), and the library searched was "LTRlib.redundant.fa". The results are shown below. I don’t know if it is possible to determine whether the paired LTRs with “identity greater than 99% and length coverage greater than 99%” are the parent of the search LTR or the individual resulting from transposition?
Or should I do BLASTN on genomic DNA?
image

Many LTRs will leave fragments of LTR after transposition, but I may not consider this situation for now. However, it may still depend on your opinion. In short, briefly, I just want to know the copy number of specific LTRs.

What suggestions do you have for this? I would be very grateful if you could answer; your answer is very important to me!
Sincerely!
Shuren

@zhangrengang
Copy link
Owner

zhangrengang commented Apr 9, 2024

I am sorry that I am not sure how to identify the mother of a LTR-RT. Perhaps a phylogeny-based method (https://github.com/zhangrengang/TEsorter?tab=readme-ov-file#further-phylogenetic-analyses) can work. If your specific LTR-RT clusters with other unactive LTR-RTs, they maybe its mother or sisters or children?

What I don't quite understand is what "LTRlib.redundant.fa" specifically refers to, and I can't find an explanation in many places. Does "reduntant" refer to all existing LTRs? And "LTRlib.fa" refers to representative LTRs after removing duplicates?

I think you are right.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants