You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear Professor Zhang, @zhangrengang
I apologize for disturbing you in your busy schedule. I know that LTR_Retriever and TEsorter are paired together, but the author of LTR_Retriever, Shujun Ou, seems to be very busy these days, so there's a question I'm concerned about that I think I have to ask you.
The issue I am most concerned about is the issue regarding the determination of the number of transpositions for a specific LTR-RT. And how to identify the parent or child of a specific LTR? Quantitative expression of some LTRs by TEtranscripts indicates that they are active LTRs, but I am curious how many times they have undergone transposition in a single genome. Please note that I am currently only targeting a single genome.
This involves the issue of LTR_retriever result files. What I don't quite understand is what "LTRlib.redundant.fa" specifically refers to, and I can't find an explanation in many places. Does "reduntant" refer to all existing LTRs? And "LTRlib.fa" refers to representative LTRs after removing duplicates?
I think this involves the search for the mother of LTRs. Because I focus on the possible origins of specific LTRs and "how many copies it has formed in the genome"; especially highly active LTRs and their transposition patterns.
I tried to use BLASTN to find the parent of individual LTRs (not sure if it is correct), and the library searched was "LTRlib.redundant.fa". The results are shown below. I don’t know if it is possible to determine whether the paired LTRs with “identity greater than 99% and length coverage greater than 99%” are the parent of the search LTR or the individual resulting from transposition?
Or should I do BLASTN on genomic DNA?
Many LTRs will leave fragments of LTR after transposition, but I may not consider this situation for now. However, it may still depend on your opinion. In short, briefly, I just want to know the copy number of specific LTRs.
What suggestions do you have for this? I would be very grateful if you could answer; your answer is very important to me!
Sincerely!
Shuren
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
What I don't quite understand is what "LTRlib.redundant.fa" specifically refers to, and I can't find an explanation in many places. Does "reduntant" refer to all existing LTRs? And "LTRlib.fa" refers to representative LTRs after removing duplicates?
Dear Professor Zhang, @zhangrengang
I apologize for disturbing you in your busy schedule. I know that LTR_Retriever and TEsorter are paired together, but the author of LTR_Retriever, Shujun Ou, seems to be very busy these days, so there's a question I'm concerned about that I think I have to ask you.
The issue I am most concerned about is the issue regarding the determination of the number of transpositions for a specific LTR-RT. And how to identify the parent or child of a specific LTR? Quantitative expression of some LTRs by TEtranscripts indicates that they are active LTRs, but I am curious how many times they have undergone transposition in a single genome. Please note that I am currently only targeting a single genome.
This involves the issue of LTR_retriever result files. What I don't quite understand is what "LTRlib.redundant.fa" specifically refers to, and I can't find an explanation in many places. Does "reduntant" refer to all existing LTRs? And "LTRlib.fa" refers to representative LTRs after removing duplicates?
I think this involves the search for the mother of LTRs. Because I focus on the possible origins of specific LTRs and "how many copies it has formed in the genome"; especially highly active LTRs and their transposition patterns.
I tried to use BLASTN to find the parent of individual LTRs (not sure if it is correct), and the library searched was "LTRlib.redundant.fa". The results are shown below. I don’t know if it is possible to determine whether the paired LTRs with “identity greater than 99% and length coverage greater than 99%” are the parent of the search LTR or the individual resulting from transposition?
Or should I do BLASTN on genomic DNA?
Many LTRs will leave fragments of LTR after transposition, but I may not consider this situation for now. However, it may still depend on your opinion. In short, briefly, I just want to know the copy number of specific LTRs.
What suggestions do you have for this? I would be very grateful if you could answer; your answer is very important to me!
Sincerely!
Shuren
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: