You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Nice project !!
From my test, rVADfast performs good segmentation of a medium sized wav file ( > 10/15 seconds )
However, If we cut the input audio (ex: to 5 sec. ), the results are not the same, why is a posteriori analysis done?
It would be nice to apply this library in realtime systems, where server analyzes audio stream, that is short packets of bit-audio in sequence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
For now, we are not considering streaming VAD use.
Not sure what is meant by, "why is a posteriori analysis done?". However, you can find explanations for the various design choices in rVAD in the corresponding research paper: https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.03588
Nice project !!
From my test, rVADfast performs good segmentation of a medium sized wav file ( > 10/15 seconds )
However, If we cut the input audio (ex: to 5 sec. ), the results are not the same, why is a posteriori analysis done?
It would be nice to apply this library in realtime systems, where server analyzes audio stream, that is short packets of bit-audio in sequence.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: