update ruff excluded

[PythonFZ]

After #567 we excluded as many as possible of ruffs errors. We should slowly bring them back.

MDSuite/pyproject.toml

Lines 13 to 20 in 0b85016

	extend-ignore = [
	"D213", "D203", "D401",
	"D100", "D101", "D102", "D103", "D105", "D107",
	"D200", "D202", "D205", "D207", "D212",
	"D400", "D404", "D405", "D406", "D407", "D409", "D410", "D411", "D412", "D413", "D414", "D415", "D416", "D417",
	"C400", "C408", "C410", "C416",
	"C901",
	"N802", "N803", "N806", "N818"

[SamTov]

Is this not done with the closing of the PR?

[SamTov]

I'm finding that ruff ignore commands are inconsistent at best.

There is a case where if you exclude D401 it reports an error saying D401 does not exist. If you remove it, you get new ruff failures for D400 and D415. Once these are added back, it passes but fails in our CI due to error D401. Once D400 and D415 are in the ignore file, then one can ignore D401 without an error.

I guess we need to correct all possible errors before seeing what the issue is but sometimes it throws and error for something that doesn't exist, for example a missing full stop that is not missing.

[PythonFZ]

I think some of the errors might be related to inconsistent versions. I tried to fix some in #582 but eventually this will be resolved with #528

I agree, that not all ruff checks are necessary, but I think ending up with a small list of deliberately selected exclusions would be the ideal case?