Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Empty envelope sender in daemon notifications #409

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: dev
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pboguslawski
Copy link
Contributor

Proposed change

Znuny daemon notifications are sent with nonempty envelope sender;
in case of delivery failures bounces may be unnecessary generated.

No such problem in regular notifications

https://github.com/znuny/Znuny/blob/dev/Kernel/System/Ticket/Event/NotificationEvent/Transport/Email.pm#L186

This mod sets empty envelope sender for daemon notifications also.

Type of change

  • '1 - 🐞 bug 🐞' - Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)

Additional information

Replaces: #161
Related: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5321#section-4.1.1.2
Author-Change-Id: IB#1111343

Checklist

  • The code change is tested and works locally.(❗)
  • There is no commented out code in this PR.(❕)
  • You improved or added new unit tests.(❕)
  • Local ZnunyCodePolicy passed.(❕)
  • Local UnitTests / Selenium passed.(❕)
  • GitHub workflow CI (UnitTests / Selenium) passed.(❗)

Znuny daemon notifications are sent with nonempty envelope sender;
in case of delivery failures bounces may be unnecessarry generated.

No such problem in regular notifications

https://github.com/znuny/Znuny/blob/dev/Kernel/System/Ticket/Event/NotificationEvent/Transport/Email.pm#L186

This mod sets empty evelope sender for deamon notifications also.

Related: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5321#section-4.1.1.2
Author-Change-Id: IB#1111343
Author-Change-Id: IB#1111343
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
1 - 🐞 bug 🐞 An issue with the system.
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants