Performance relative to elm/bytes

[MartinSStewart]

I'm guessing that keeping track of where an error occurs while decoding makes elm-bytes-parser slower than elm/bytes. Is there any bench-marking to determine how much slower though?

I'm working on elm-codec-bytes and I would like for it to be able to give useful error messages when it fails to decode data. I'm considering replacing elm/bytes with this package but I only want to do that if the performance difference isn't large.