Deprecate `*_path` methods in mailers #15840

schneems · 2014-06-20T18:00:01Z

Email does not support relative links since there is no implicit host. Therefore all links inside of emails must be fully qualified URLs. All path helpers are now deprecated. When removed, the error will give early indication to developers to use *_url methods instead.

Currently if a developer uses a *_path helper, their tests and mail_view will not catch the mistake. The only way to see the error is by sending emails in production. Preventing sending out emails with non-working path's is the desired end goal of this PR.

Currently path helpers are mixed-in to controllers (the ActionMailer::Base acts as a controller). All *_url and *_path helpers are made available through the same module. This PR separates this behavior into two modules so we can extend the *_path methods to add a Deprecation to them. Once deprecated we can use this same area to raise a NoMethodError and add an informative message directing the developer to use *_url instead.

The module with warnings is only mixed in when a controller returns false from the newly added supports_relative_path?.

Paired @sgrif & @schneems

sgrif · 2014-06-20T18:05:01Z

Is there a good place for an integration test with a mailer?

vipulnsward · 2014-06-20T18:10:10Z

I think deprecating the behaviour would cause some pain. I had mentioned people reuse views in emails.

Example: In one of my projects I used https://github.com/pokonski/public_activity, and render/reuse the same views from web/ update emails.

The problem is, developer is forced to either use multiple views in this case, add a hack, or start using *_url helpers in web views too, which might not be desirable in some cases.

Any way to overcome this?

schneems · 2014-06-20T18:24:55Z

@sgrif not sure about the best place. I added one here: https://github.com/rails/rails/pull/15840/files#diff-6cd2f2bc2d75ddac6c0d1e85983e983dR406 in mailer_previews_test

@vipulnsward are you on the rails-contributors mailing list? We've talked about this behavior a bit. Sharing views between emails and mailers should be fine, though right now if they're using _path in any of those views, those links won't work when rendered as an email. Is that their desired behavior?

sgrif · 2014-06-20T20:40:59Z

actionview/lib/action_view/rendering.rb

@@ -35,12 +35,13 @@ def process(*) #:nodoc:
    module ClassMethods
      def view_context_class
        @view_context_class ||= begin
-          routes = respond_to?(:_routes) && _routes
+          include_path_helpers = self.supports_relative_path?


I think we can drop the self here.

vipulnsward · 2014-06-20T20:57:26Z

@schneems I missed the discussion. Will check.

egilburg · 2014-06-20T23:05:08Z

Even if this doesn't have an implicit host, why does _path must be deprecated? The partial path should still work and it's up to user if and how they want to use it.

schneems · 2014-06-21T05:40:58Z

The partial path should still work

How so? You'll send an email with an unclickable link. If you need this functionality you can use a URL helper and pass in only_path: true.

pixeltrix · 2014-06-21T09:05:40Z

What about forcing :only_path to be false for all URL helpers in the context of a mailer view?

schneems · 2014-06-24T18:35:41Z

The *_path helpers are expected to return relative paths. Having them return the full path would fix the problem but break expectations.

Any comments or questions on implementation?

guilleiguaran · 2014-06-28T14:25:47Z

👍

robin850 · 2014-06-29T09:37:23Z

actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb

+          # Rails.application.routes.url_helpers.url_for(args)
+          @_routes = routes
+          class << self
+            delegate :url_for, :optimize_routes_generation?, :to => '@_routes'


Nitpick but could we use 1.9 hash syntax here please ? :-) Thanks for the patch so far! 👍

done, i also updated the hashes in define_named_route_methods for consistency

andyjeffries · 2014-07-09T07:04:39Z

I agree with this PR, I think it's a non-obvious thing that newer Rails devs may get caught by and not understand why things aren't working for their end users.

schuetzm · 2014-07-09T08:39:50Z

I think there should still be a way to get at the bare paths. For example:
<%= link_to login_url(return_to: user_settings_path) %>
But it's fine if the _path helpers would require an explicit only_path: true.

fxn · 2014-07-16T07:47:52Z

@schneems thanks for the patch, will try to review soon!

fxn · 2014-07-24T19:45:56Z

Hi @schneems!

I had a look at the patch. Looks good to me, I like the overall idea of separating URL and path modules.

Regarding the implementation I only have some minor remarks:

In principle I don't see a need for representing this support in a predicate like supports_relative_path?. I believe it is enough to leave everything as is today, except that the AM railtie would pass a hard-coded false flag. This is not something we want to be overridden and we have a railtie for each component anyway.
About terminology: "/posts" is an absolute path. There are some places where "relative paths" are mentioned. Indeed, since the context is so clear (naming is "url" vs just "path" everywhere), we could either refer to "path helpers", or "relative URLs", leaning probably on the former in my opinion.
What do you think about passing a flag to path_helpers_module instead of a lambda that gives you a message? In principle I'd prefer to simplify that and have the message just down in the code that issues the deprecation. I believe path_helpers_module can be responsible for the deprecation message.
In master define_named_route_methods has changed a little bit, there's now a constant that indicates whether you want a URL or a path. Since define_url_helper is the one that defines stuff in @module, I guess this patch could now branch depending on FULL/PATH instead of being passed the target module. (Off the top of my head, let's see if it looks good once written.)
The Action Mailer guide could mention this.
Let's register this in the CHANGELOG.

Let's iterate a little bit and done!

schuetzm · 2014-07-25T08:05:31Z

actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb

+          if include_path_helpers
+            path_helpers = routes.named_routes.path_helpers_module
+          else
+            warning_block = ->(name) {"The method `#{name}` cannot be used here as relative links are not supported. Use `#{name.sub(/_path$/, '_url')}` instead"}


The message also needs to tell the user what to do when he indeed needs only the path. For example, xxx_url only_path: true (but please check if that actually works, didn't test it).

I'm 👎 on this suggestion. Error messages are to point out what is wrong, and tell of a fix. If this use case was as likely as the unintentional use of _path then I would agree, but here it's such a minority it will distract and confuse. The statement is factually correct, tells how to get rid of the error/deprecation and does not assume how it will be used. Pointing someone to a _url is still correct. The error message is not a complete substitute for docs.

The 1% of time people need this non working url, it's in the docs for _url helpers and is extremely google-able.

Ok, but does only_path actually still work? That's what I'm most concerned about.

yes, this doesn't touch the implementation of *_url only *_path

schneems · 2014-07-25T19:16:00Z

In principle I don't see a need for representing this support in a predicate like supports_relative_path?. I believe it is enough to leave everything as is today, except that the AM railtie would pass a hard-coded false flag. This is not something we want to be overridden and we have a railtie for each component anyway.

Moving this logic to the railtie is the only component i'm having problems with. The behavior is deeply nested inside of action view. We need to get this state information to https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/actionview/lib/action_view/rendering.rb#L43-L44 somehow. This is included in ActionMailer directly through ActionView::Layouts https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/actionmailer/lib/action_mailer/base.rb#L416

This seems like a likely place to add logic, but this doesn't affect path helpers in the view (not actually sure what it is doing): https://github.com/rails/rails/blob/master/actionmailer/lib/action_mailer/railtie.rb#L33

Do you have any ideas or thoughts on how to move this logic to the railtie? cc @sgrif

About terminology: "/posts" is an absolute path. There are some places where "relative paths" are mentioned. Indeed, since the context is so clear (naming is "url" vs just "path" everywhere), we could either refer to "path helpers", or "relative URLs", leaning probably on the former in my opinion.

Updated to proper naming

What do you think about passing a flag to path_helpers_module instead of a lambda that gives you a message? In principle I'd prefer to simplify that and have the message just down in the code that issues the deprecation. I believe path_helpers_module can be responsible for the deprecation message.

I'm fine with this, changed to a boolean

In master define_named_route_methods has changed a little bit, there's now a constant that indicates whether you want a URL or a path. Since define_url_helper is the one that defines stuff in @module, I guess this patch could now branch depending on FULL/PATH instead of being passed the target module. (Off the top of my head, let's see if it looks good once written.)

Updated to use this technique instead of module injection.

The Action Mailer guide could mention this.

Updated to mention this behavior

Let's register this in the CHANGELOG.

Done

fxn · 2014-07-30T13:55:48Z

For the archives, we've discussed by email adding the same behavior to mailer instances (in addition to their templates).

@schneems I believe we are close. Would you mind doing a couple of last small edits?

In the CHANGELOG entry there's a double "instead" in the last sentence.
In the hunk for the guide, the link_to examples need a comma, and the last paragraph does not read well.

Could do that myself after pushing, but if you didn't mind the commit would be more round.

arthurnn · 2014-07-30T14:39:55Z

LGTM

@sgrif

Email does not support relative links since there is no implicit host. Therefore all links inside of emails must be fully qualified URLs. All path helpers are now deprecated. When removed, the error will give early indication to developers to use `*_url` methods instead. Currently if a developer uses a `*_path` helper, their tests and `mail_view` will not catch the mistake. The only way to see the error is by sending emails in production. Preventing sending out emails with non-working path's is the desired end goal of this PR. Currently path helpers are mixed-in to controllers (the ActionMailer::Base acts as a controller). All `*_url` and `*_path` helpers are made available through the same module. This PR separates this behavior into two modules so we can extend the `*_path` methods to add a Deprecation to them. Once deprecated we can use this same area to raise a NoMethodError and add an informative message directing the developer to use `*_url` instead. The module with warnings is only mixed in when a controller returns false from the newly added `supports_relative_path?`. Paired @sgrif & @schneems

schneems · 2014-07-30T17:54:02Z

There were a ton of merge conflicts introduced in the last 24 hours (https://github.com/rails/rails/commits/master/actionpack/lib/action_dispatch/routing/route_set.rb). I fixed those. Removed double "instead". Wrote a different last paragraph for the guide. Also had to modify a test that was asserting *_url methods cannot be used directly in mailers. Test introduced 4 years ago, I don't believe the behavior it was asserting was valid.

Looks like build is now green.

fxn · 2014-07-30T21:08:51Z

Looking good!

@schneems you've devoted a lot of time to this PR, since the first discussions in the mailing list to the (not easy) patch and later revisions. That was awesome and really appreciated, thanks so much for working on this. ❤️

…h_methods Deprecate `*_path` methods in mailers

calebhearth · 2014-07-30T23:37:25Z

rails/rails#15840

sgrif reviewed Jun 20, 2014
View reviewed changes

robin850 reviewed Jun 29, 2014
View reviewed changes

robin850 added the actionmailer label Jun 29, 2014

robin850 added this to the 4.2.0 milestone Jun 29, 2014

schuetzm reviewed Jul 25, 2014
View reviewed changes

fxn added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 30, 2014

Merge pull request #15840 from schneems/schneems/deprecate-mailer_pat…

bd944e0

…h_methods Deprecate `*_path` methods in mailers

fxn merged commit bd944e0 into rails:master Jul 30, 2014

seanlinsley added a commit to drapergem/draper that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2016

_path helpers are no longer available in mailers

88963fc

rails/rails#15840

seanlinsley added a commit to drapergem/draper that referenced this pull request Jul 4, 2016

_path helpers are no longer available in mailers

1e52e79

rails/rails#15840

jmromer mentioned this pull request Jan 30, 2020

path helpers are no longer available when a template is rendered by a mailer bikeindex/bike_index#1485

Closed

wiesion mentioned this pull request Mar 13, 2021

Quickfix, replaces thumbnail_url with polymorphic_url alexbevi/redmine_knowledgebase#394

Closed

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Deprecate `*_path` methods in mailers #15840

Deprecate `*_path` methods in mailers #15840

schneems commented Jun 20, 2014

sgrif commented Jun 20, 2014

vipulnsward commented Jun 20, 2014

schneems commented Jun 20, 2014

sgrif Jun 20, 2014

schneems Jun 20, 2014

vipulnsward commented Jun 20, 2014

egilburg commented Jun 20, 2014

schneems commented Jun 21, 2014

pixeltrix commented Jun 21, 2014

schneems commented Jun 24, 2014

guilleiguaran commented Jun 28, 2014

robin850 Jun 29, 2014

schneems Jul 8, 2014

andyjeffries commented Jul 9, 2014

schuetzm commented Jul 9, 2014

fxn commented Jul 16, 2014

fxn commented Jul 24, 2014

schuetzm Jul 25, 2014

schneems Jul 25, 2014

schuetzm Jul 25, 2014

schneems Jul 25, 2014

schneems commented Jul 25, 2014

fxn commented Jul 30, 2014

arthurnn commented Jul 30, 2014

schneems commented Jul 30, 2014

fxn commented Jul 30, 2014

calebhearth commented Jul 30, 2014

Deprecate *_path methods in mailers #15840

Deprecate *_path methods in mailers #15840

Conversation

schneems commented Jun 20, 2014

sgrif commented Jun 20, 2014

vipulnsward commented Jun 20, 2014

schneems commented Jun 20, 2014

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

vipulnsward commented Jun 20, 2014

egilburg commented Jun 20, 2014

schneems commented Jun 21, 2014

pixeltrix commented Jun 21, 2014

schneems commented Jun 24, 2014

guilleiguaran commented Jun 28, 2014

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

andyjeffries commented Jul 9, 2014

schuetzm commented Jul 9, 2014

fxn commented Jul 16, 2014

fxn commented Jul 24, 2014

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

schneems commented Jul 25, 2014

fxn commented Jul 30, 2014

arthurnn commented Jul 30, 2014

schneems commented Jul 30, 2014

fxn commented Jul 30, 2014

calebhearth commented Jul 30, 2014

Deprecate `*_path` methods in mailers #15840

Deprecate `*_path` methods in mailers #15840