more explorative tests for webc:for

[sombriks]

i was trying to build that scenario for the issue i was facing, however i am not sure anymore if it's a issue at all.

i did this testcase, please merge it if it worth anything.

i'll try to apply what i learned doing it on my faulty code, see if the issue was, once again, between the keyboard and the chair ;-)

[zachleat]

Just so I understand, this is testing aliasing the loop item as a separate variable name?

[lsilveira-boku]

Just so I understand, this is testing aliasing the loop item as a separate variable name?

yes, and nesting loops too.

it works perfectly, the issue i saw must be related to my use on my blog, not to webc itself.

on a smaller note, i got access to the variable created by for inside one of the components, however they are inside the default slot, so i think this is expected.

it was a very clean way to understand my problem, an the test suite is quite nice to read and understand.