-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
stat produces incorrect results when using secondary table #12
Comments
And a reproducible example using
|
Not to be a nuisance, but is this a case of user error, or is this a real bug? This effect is a major blocker for adoption of this format for a few projects. |
I agree, @38 could you look into this ASAP? |
@snystrom just to confirm, this behavior exists on the latest (0.2.18) version as well, correct? |
Yeah I just checked it. |
Hi there, thanks for reporting this issue. It should be fixed by the latest commit. It would be great if you can confirm that. Thanks! |
Great. This fixed it on my laptop. |
Confirm also fixed on my end, thanks a bunch! |
I'm having an error where
stat
produces incorrect results depending on how the d4 file was generated.If generated using the default
d4tools create
, I get incorrect values formean
andmedian
. However, if generating the file usingd4tools create -S
, that d4 file produces accurate median and stat measurements. Accessing the values usingd4tools view
is accurate, however for both types of d4 file, and if I compute a rough estimate of the average from theview
scores (without accounting for binning), I get a correct-ish number in both instances.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: