-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 216
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
cmake is heavyweight #26
Comments
Not sure CMake is much more heavyweight than old Autotools scripts, but I think we could provide something like "bare-bone" Makefile to build mbusd binary only for resource constrained platforms. |
A barebones makefile would be great. On 4 of the last 5 targets I built it for, getting cmake and infrastructure going wasn't possible. Likely m4 and autotools wouldn't have been either. But the bare metal gcc above buildt it fine. |
Do you have a pull request? Alternatively add a gitlab-ci target and let it compile there, like that |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
@kb0thn
We've been doing these things in a Docker, to avoid removing the platform's own We did find that some Debian packages are platform-neutral, but then continue to depend a platform-specific form, about which it then got confused. So in reality, your mileage would vary, but this is so simple you should give it a try. |
This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions. |
Running the latest version of cmake is a heavy requirement to build in place on embedded and older systems. Building it really just comes down to:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: