-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use of path part of URL in IngestConfiguration.entryPoint for pull ingest #19
Comments
Proposal is to delete the sentence from 8.2 ("The IngestConfiguration.entryPoint shall not contain a path part.") to relax the rules for the entryPoint field. @rjb1000 to raise a draft CR to stimulate discussion in SA4. |
3GPP draft Change Request to TS 26.512 Rel-16 S4aI221386 opened for initial discussion at today's 3GPP SA4 MBS subworking group ad hoc call. Discussion will continue on 20th October. (Plan is to create a Rel-17 counterpart later that makes equivalent changes there.) |
Latest draft CR proposes deprecating the confusingly named To compensate, a |
Latest draft CRs available to 5G-MAG members on Causeway as CDT0107.3GPP SA4#121 TS26.512 API corrections. |
The following Change Requests were agreed at SA4#121 Closing Plenary yesterday afternoon:
|
New specifications published: |
Problem Description
In TS 26.512:
The limitation in section 8.2 seems to go against the spirit of using the IngestConfiguration.entryPoint as a base URL by forbidding the use of the path part of the URL. By also excluding the IngestConfiguration.path from the method of creating the pull ingest URL, this forces any path required at the IngestConfiguration.entryPoint to be inserted using the Regex backed DistributionConfigurations.PathRewriteRules, when a computationally less expensive concatenation would have sufficed.
There should also be clarification about what is meant by "base URL" in table 7.6.3.1-1 as the simple meaning of it being a base prefix, as suggested by the description in section 8.2, is different from the interpretation and usage in URL resolution of a base URI according to IETF RFC3986.
Discussion
Should the restriction on the path part of the URL be dropped in Section 8.2 to allow simpler configurations to be possible when creating a Content Hosting Configuration?
Is the intention of "base URL" in table 7.6.3.1-1 to resolve URLs according to the usage of base URIs as stated in IETF RFC 3986?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: