-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 351
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement increment for pure SoA #3278
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🚀
Not fully yet, tested and I get:
We might need to generalize Maybe for SoA particle containers, we should allow only With #3281 applied, it fails in
|
Update: my last push to #3281 seems to build with WarpX :) |
The proposed changes: - [x] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX - [ ] add new capabilities to AMReX - [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level - [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users - [ ] include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate
The proposed changes: - [x] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX - [x] add new capabilities to AMReX - [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level - [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users - [ ] include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate
…es#3284) The proposed changes: - [x] fix a bug or incorrect behavior in AMReX - [ ] add new capabilities to AMReX - [ ] changes answers in the test suite to more than roundoff level - [ ] are likely to significantly affect the results of downstream AMReX users - [ ] include documentation in the code and/or rst files, if appropriate
Follow-up to #2878.
The proposed changes: