Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.10.0 #342

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 14, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Mar 10, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
react-router-dom 6.8.2 -> 6.10.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

remix-run/react-router

v6.10.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • Added support for Future Flags in React Router. The first flag being introduced is future.v7_normalizeFormMethod which will normalize the exposed useNavigation()/useFetcher() formMethod fields as uppercase HTTP methods to align with the fetch() behavior. (#​10207)

    • When future.v7_normalizeFormMethod === false (default v6 behavior),
      • useNavigation().formMethod is lowercase
      • useFetcher().formMethod is lowercase
    • When future.v7_normalizeFormMethod === true:
      • useNavigation().formMethod is uppercase
      • useFetcher().formMethod is uppercase
Patch Changes
  • Fix createStaticHandler to also check for ErrorBoundary on routes in addition to errorElement (#​10190)
  • Updated dependencies:
    • @remix-run/router@1.5.0
    • react-router@6.10.0

v6.9.0

Compare Source

Minor Changes
  • React Router now supports an alternative way to define your route element and errorElement fields as React Components instead of React Elements. You can instead pass a React Component to the new Component and ErrorBoundary fields if you choose. There is no functional difference between the two, so use whichever approach you prefer 😀. You shouldn't be defining both, but if you do Component/ErrorBoundary will "win". (#​10045)

    Example JSON Syntax

    // Both of these work the same:
    const elementRoutes = [{
      path: '/',
      element: <Home />,
      errorElement: <HomeError />,
    }]
    
    const componentRoutes = [{
      path: '/',
      Component: Home,
      ErrorBoundary: HomeError,
    }]
    
    function Home() { ... }
    function HomeError() { ... }

    Example JSX Syntax

    // Both of these work the same:
    const elementRoutes = createRoutesFromElements(
      <Route path='/' element={<Home />} errorElement={<HomeError /> } />
    );
    
    const componentRoutes = createRoutesFromElements(
      <Route path='/' Component={Home} ErrorBoundary={HomeError} />
    );
    
    function Home() { ... }
    function HomeError() { ... }
  • Introducing Lazy Route Modules! (#​10045)

    In order to keep your application bundles small and support code-splitting of your routes, we've introduced a new lazy() route property. This is an async function that resolves the non-route-matching portions of your route definition (loader, action, element/Component, errorElement/ErrorBoundary, shouldRevalidate, handle).

    Lazy routes are resolved on initial load and during the loading or submitting phase of a navigation or fetcher call. You cannot lazily define route-matching properties (path, index, children) since we only execute your lazy route functions after we've matched known routes.

    Your lazy functions will typically return the result of a dynamic import.

    // In this example, we assume most folks land on the homepage so we include that
    // in our critical-path bundle, but then we lazily load modules for /a and /b so
    // they don't load until the user navigates to those routes
    let routes = createRoutesFromElements(
      <Route path="/" element={<Layout />}>
        <Route index element={<Home />} />
        <Route path="a" lazy={() => import("./a")} />
        <Route path="b" lazy={() => import("./b")} />
      </Route>
    );

    Then in your lazy route modules, export the properties you want defined for the route:

    export async function loader({ request }) {
      let data = await fetchData(request);
      return json(data);
    }
    
    // Export a `Component` directly instead of needing to create a React Element from it
    export function Component() {
      let data = useLoaderData();
    
      return (
        <>
          <h1>You made it!</h1>
          <p>{data}</p>
        </>
      );
    }
    
    // Export an `ErrorBoundary` directly instead of needing to create a React Element from it
    export function ErrorBoundary() {
      let error = useRouteError();
      return isRouteErrorResponse(error) ? (
        <h1>
          {error.status} {error.statusText}
        </h1>
      ) : (
        <h1>{error.message || error}</h1>
      );
    }

    An example of this in action can be found in the examples/lazy-loading-router-provider directory of the repository.

    🙌 Huge thanks to @​rossipedia for the Initial Proposal and POC Implementation.

  • Updated dependencies:

    • react-router@6.9.0
    • @remix-run/router@1.4.0

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot changed the title chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.9.0 chore(deps): update dependency react-router-dom to v6.10.0 Mar 30, 2023
@renovate renovate bot force-pushed the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch from 2f4ae54 to ae3ba09 Compare March 30, 2023 00:33
@bastianccm bastianccm merged commit ff9c013 into main Apr 14, 2023
@bastianccm bastianccm deleted the renovate/react-router-monorepo branch April 14, 2023 14:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant