Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ImfChromaticities.cpp: Add back white to equality ops. #666

Conversation

arkellr
Copy link
Contributor

@arkellr arkellr commented Feb 21, 2020

This was discussed on openexr-dev and the unanimous conclusion was that white
be added back; NB: no one could quite remember why it was omitted in the first place.

See issue #651.

IMPORTANT: This commit changes the existing behavior of the == and != operators
so schedule its inclusion into an appropriate OpenEXR release.

Signed-off-by: Arkell Rasiah arasiah@pixsystem.com

This was discussed on openexr-dev and the unanimous conclusion was that white
be added back; NB: no one could quite remember why it was omitted in the first place.

See PR#651.

IMPORTANT: This commit changes the existing behavior of the == and != operators
so schedule its inclusion into the appropriate OpenEXR release.

Signed-off-by: Arkell Rasiah <arasiah@pixsystem.com>
@arkellr
Copy link
Contributor Author

arkellr commented Feb 21, 2020

Speak of the devil... I just realized its PR "666"

Copy link
Contributor

@meshula meshula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🔥 😈 🔥

@cary-ilm cary-ilm added the Needs Discussion To be discussed in the technical steering committee label Feb 26, 2020
Copy link
Member

@cary-ilm cary-ilm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@cary-ilm cary-ilm merged commit 2f92fcb into AcademySoftwareFoundation:master Feb 27, 2020
@cary-ilm cary-ilm added this to the v2.5.0 milestone Apr 26, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Discussion To be discussed in the technical steering committee v2.5.0
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants