Add logger name to non-pretty loggers

[vlasy]

And fix logger name for pretty loggers

[smoliji]

I am now consfused with the differencies between moduleName and the new loggerName.

The purpose of the moduleName should've been to create a named module, so I could disable logging for a certain part (module) of the application. Whereas the loggerName propagates the given name to each of the logs.

If this is the case, I suggest to merge those two - use a name attribute (e.g. moduleName) and propagate this name to every log.

[vlasy]

I am now consfused with the differencies between moduleName and the new loggerName.

The situation before was following: if you passed a string to loggerFactory, named logger was created. Therefore its name was shown in all pretty logs and probably was present in non-pretty logs as name property. However, if you logged any object with name key, it collided with this logger name.

After this change: If you pass a string to loggerFactory, named logger will be created. But it will no longer collide with objects with field name + it will be also visible as part of the message in non-pretty logs.

But you are right - I could rename moduleName to loggerName so this will be more explicit.

The purpose of the moduleName should've been to create a named module, so I could disable logging for a certain part (module) of the application. Whereas the loggerName propagates the given name to each of the logs.

I think this PR changes nothing about disabling loggers.