Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Long Distance Travel Module #496

Open
bettinardi opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Long Distance Travel Module #496

bettinardi opened this issue Oct 7, 2021 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
Feature New feature or request

Comments

@bettinardi
Copy link

Ohio and Oregon (ODOTx2) have pooled money to develop an LDT for ActivitySim. ODOTx2 have long term interest in this, as both of their statewide models currently have LDT representation. Other geographically large ActivitySim implementations might desire to use specific representation of longer distance travel (ODOTx2 models handle trips shorter than 25miles different than long distance travel decisions). Work has not yet started on LDT, but should in 2022. Additional status updates will be provided on this issue and the intent is to get feedback from ActivitySim partners as there is interest.

@bstabler bstabler added this to To Discuss in Phase 6b Tasks Oct 7, 2021
@bstabler
Copy link
Contributor

bstabler commented Oct 19, 2021

As discussed on the 10/19/21 call,
- Alex (@bettinardi) and Rebekah (@rls-odot) introduced the effort
- They shared the scope for comment by next week
- Would be good to create an example_long_distance like the other examples so the code added for the model is backed by tests moving forward
- Some of the new components from the cross border model will be useful for this model as well
- Model was already designed, implemented, estimated, and calibrated years ago so this current effort is focused on re-implementation in ActivitySim
- ODOTs will periodically share progress with the agency partners

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Feature New feature or request
Projects
Phase 6b Tasks
To Discuss
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants