Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PyRFLX: Allow pyrflx object creation directly from model #467

Closed
jklmnn opened this issue Oct 15, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #468
Closed

PyRFLX: Allow pyrflx object creation directly from model #467

jklmnn opened this issue Oct 15, 2020 · 0 comments · Fixed by #468
Assignees

Comments

@jklmnn
Copy link
Member

jklmnn commented Oct 15, 2020

To prevent reparsing and recreating a model when using PyRFLX with an already available model the default constructor should support supplying a model. Additionally there should be a convenience function to support the current arguments.

@jklmnn jklmnn created this issue from a note in RecordFlux 0.5 (In progress) Oct 15, 2020
@jklmnn jklmnn self-assigned this Oct 15, 2020
@jklmnn jklmnn moved this from In progress to Done in RecordFlux 0.5 Oct 19, 2020
RecordFlux 0.5 automation moved this from Done to Merged Oct 19, 2020
@treiher treiher mentioned this issue Aug 4, 2021
9 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
No open projects
RecordFlux 0.5
  
Merged
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant