azd
hooks vs CI/CD pipelines
#1613
lechnerc77
started this conversation in
General
Replies: 2 comments 8 replies
-
@jongio - Since there is no context passed to the hooks, what is the real advantage of using hooks vs doing this entirely in the pipeline/workflow? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@rajyraman, using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
8 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi community,
I have a point I would like to discuss: with the advent of the hooks in
azd
several new options to enhance the functionality ofazd
are available.One interesting scenario was shown in the February community standup, where a service lifecycle event hook was leveraged to execute the tests defined in the app before doing the deployment. Thinking a bit about this scenario raises the question in my mind of what to put into the
azd
definition and what to put into a CI/CD pipeline.Although I like the spin of keeping things self-contained and having this step as part of the
azure.yaml
, I think I would have put that a s a dedicated step in a GitHub action as this is at least from my perspective more explicit while "hiding" this as part of theazd
is more implicit.Although I think there is no "right" or "wrong" here, I would be very interested in hearing your opinions on this topic.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions