Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Azure Red Hat OpenShift 2024-08-12-preview #29671

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from

Conversation

cadenmarchese
Copy link

ARM (Control Plane) API Specification Update Pull Request

Tip

Overwhelmed by all this guidance? See the Getting help section at the bottom of this PR description.

PR review workflow diagram

Please understand this diagram before proceeding. It explains how to get your PR approved & merged.

spec_pr_review_workflow_diagram

Purpose of this PR

What's the purpose of this PR? Check the specific option that applies. This is mandatory!

  • New resource provider.
  • New API version for an existing resource provider. (If API spec is not defined in TypeSpec, the PR should have been created in adherence to OpenAPI specs PR creation guidance).
  • Update existing version for a new feature. (This is applicable only when you are revising a private preview API version.)
  • Update existing version to fix OpenAPI spec quality issues in S360.
  • Other, please clarify:
    • edit this with your clarification

Due diligence checklist

To merge this PR, you must go through the following checklist and confirm you understood
and followed the instructions by checking all the boxes:

  • I confirm this PR is modifying Azure Resource Manager (ARM) related specifications, and not data plane related specifications.
  • I have reviewed following Resource Provider guidelines, including
    ARM resource provider contract and
    REST guidelines (estimated time: 4 hours).
    I understand this is required before I can proceed to the diagram Step 2, "ARM API changes review", for this PR.

Additional information

Viewing API changes

For convenient view of the API changes made by this PR, refer to the URLs provided in the table
in the Generated ApiView comment added to this PR. You can use ApiView to show API versions diff.

Suppressing failures

If one or multiple validation error/warning suppression(s) is detected in your PR, please follow the
suppressions guide to get approval.

Getting help

  • First, please carefully read through this PR description, from top to bottom. Please fill out the Purpose of this PR and Due diligence checklist.
  • If you don't have permissions to remove or add labels to the PR, request write access per aka.ms/azsdk/access#request-access-to-rest-api-or-sdk-repositories
  • To understand what you must do next to merge this PR, see the Next Steps to Merge comment. It will appear within few minutes of submitting this PR and will continue to be up-to-date with current PR state.
  • For guidance on fixing this PR CI check failures, see the hyperlinks provided in given failure
    and https://aka.ms/ci-fix.
  • For help with ARM review (PR workflow diagram Step 2), see https://aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review.
  • If the PR CI checks appear to be stuck in queued state, please add a comment with contents /azp run.
    This should result in a new comment denoting a PR validation pipeline has started and the checks should be updated after few minutes.
  • If the help provided by the previous points is not enough, post to https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel and link to this PR.

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Next Steps to Merge

Next steps that must be taken to merge this PR:
  • ❌ This PR is in purview of the ARM review (label: ARMReview). This PR must get ARMSignedOff label from an ARM reviewer.
    This PR has ARMChangesRequested label. Please address or respond to feedback from the ARM API reviewer.
    When you are ready to continue the ARM API review, please remove the ARMChangesRequested label.
    Automation should then add WaitForARMFeedback label.
    ❗If you don't have permissions to remove the label, request write access per aka.ms/azsdk/access#request-access-to-rest-api-or-sdk-repositories.
    For details of the ARM review, see aka.ms/azsdk/pr-arm-review
  • ❌ The required check named Automated merging requirements met has failed. This is the final check that must pass. Refer to the check in the PR's 'Checks' tab for details on how to fix it and consult the aka.ms/ci-fix guide. In addition, refer to step 4 in the PR workflow diagram

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Swagger Validation Report

️️✔️BreakingChange succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There are no breaking changes.
️❌Breaking Change(Cross-Version): 1 Errors, 12 Warnings failed [Detail]
Compared specs (v0.10.12) new version base version
redhatopenshift.json 2024-08-12-preview(4c825bc) 2023-11-22(main)
redhatopenshift.json 2024-08-12-preview(4c825bc) 2023-07-01-preview(main)

The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest stable version:

Rule Message
1049 - RemovedXmsEnum The new version is missing a 'x-ms-enum' found in the old version.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1906:9
Old: common-types/resource-management/v3/types.json#L214:9


The following breaking changes are detected by comparison with the latest preview version:

Rule Message
⚠️ 1023 - TypeFormatChanged The new version has a different format '' than the previous one 'arm-id'.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1872:9
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1853:9
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1839:9
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1821:9
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1745:9
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1745:9
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1750:9
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1749:9
⚠️ 1029 - ReadonlyPropertyChanged The read only property has changed from 'false' to 'true'.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1934:9
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1896:9
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'outboundIps' renamed or removed?
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1944:7
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1905:7
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'outboundIpPrefixes' renamed or removed?
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1944:7
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1905:7
⚠️ 1033 - RemovedProperty The new version is missing a property found in the old version. Was 'allocatedOutboundPorts' renamed or removed?
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1944:7
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1905:7
⚠️ 1040 - AddedReadOnlyPropertyInResponse The new version has a new read-only property 'workerProfilesStatus' in response that was not found in the old version.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2159:7
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2129:7
⚠️ 1048 - AddedXmsEnum The new version adds a x-ms-enum extension.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2160:9
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2130:9
⚠️ 1048 - AddedXmsEnum The new version adds a x-ms-enum extension.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2388:5
Old: openshiftclusters/preview/2023-07-01-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2315:5
⚠️ 1049 - RemovedXmsEnum The new version is missing a 'x-ms-enum' found in the old version.
New: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L1906:9
Old: common-types/resource-management/v3/types.json#L214:9
️️✔️CredScan succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
There is no credential detected.
️❌LintDiff: 1 Errors, 1 Warnings failed [Detail]
Compared specs (v2.2.2) new version base version
package-2023-07-01-preview package-2023-07-01-preview(4c825bc) default(main)
package-2023-11-22 package-2023-11-22(4c825bc) default(main)
package-2024-08-12-preview package-2024-08-12-preview(4c825bc) default(main)

[must fix]The following errors/warnings are introduced by current PR:

Rule Message Related RPC [For API reviewers]
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2625
RPC-Policy-V1-05, RPC-Put-V1-23
⚠️ UniqueXmsExample Do not have duplicate name of x-ms-example, make sure every x-ms-example name unique. Duplicate x-ms-example: Creates or updates a OpenShift cluster with the specified subscription, resource group and resource name.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L602


The following errors/warnings exist before current PR submission:

Only 30 items are listed, please refer to log for more details.

Rule Message
OperationsApiResponseSchema The response schema of operations API '/providers/Microsoft.RedHatOpenShift/operations' does not match the ARM specification. Please standardize the schema.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L35
OperationsApiSchemaUsesCommonTypes Operations API path must follow the schema provided in the common types.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L36
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'resourceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L394
ProvisioningStateMustBeReadOnly provisioningState property must be set to readOnly.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L423
ProvisioningStateMustBeReadOnly provisioningState property must be set to readOnly.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L477
ProvisioningStateMustBeReadOnly provisioningState property must be set to readOnly.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L483
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L490
LroLocationHeader A 202 response should include an Location response header.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L527
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L536
PatchResponseCodes Long-running PATCH operations must have responses with 200, 202 and default return codes. They also must not have other response codes.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L547
UnSupportedPatchProperties Mark the property 'properties.provisioningState', specified in the patch operation body, as readOnly or immutable. You could also choose to remove it from the request payload of the Patch operation. This property is not patchable.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L571
LroPatch202 The async patch operation should return 202.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L581
ProvisioningStateMustBeReadOnly provisioningState property must be set to readOnly.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L584
ProvisioningStateMustBeReadOnly provisioningState property must be set to readOnly.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L590
LroErrorContent Error response content of long running operations must follow the error schema provided in the common types v2 and above.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L597
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'resourceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L609
ResourceNameRestriction The resource name parameter 'resourceName' should be defined with a 'pattern' restriction.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L656
AvoidAdditionalProperties Definitions must not have properties named additionalProperties except for user defined tags or predefined references.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L2614
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L29
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L66
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L69
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L72
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L109
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L112
⚠️ MissingSegmentsInNestedResourceListOperation A nested resource type's List operation must include all the parent segments in its api path.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L139
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L149
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L152
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L155
⚠️ MissingSegmentsInNestedResourceListOperation A nested resource type's List operation must include all the parent segments in its api path.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L192
⚠️ LatestVersionOfCommonTypesMustBeUsed Use the latest version v5 of types.json.
Location: openshiftclusters/preview/2024-08-12-preview/redhatopenshift.json#L202
️❌Avocado: 1 Errors, 0 Warnings failed [Detail]
Rule Message
NOT_LATEST_API_VERSION_IN_DEFAULT_TAG The default tag does not contains the latest API version. Please make sure the latest api version swaggers are in the default tag.
readme: resource-manager/Microsoft.RedHatOpenShift/openshiftclusters/readme.md
json: openshiftclusters/stable/2023-11-22/redhatopenshift.json
️️✔️SwaggerAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️TypeSpecAPIView succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
️️✔️ModelValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for ModelValidation.
️️✔️SemanticValidation succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SemanticValidation.
️️✔️PoliCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passed for PoliCheck.
️️✔️SpellCheck succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for SpellCheck.
️️✔️Lint(RPaaS) succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Lint(RPaaS).
️️✔️PR Summary succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Validation passes for Summary.
️️✔️Automated merging requirements met succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 2, 2024

Swagger Generation Artifacts

️️✔️ApiDocPreview succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
 Please click here to preview with your @microsoft account. 
️️✔️ azure-sdk-for-go succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from 8d7fcc4c314ced925bfb7bbe6f5796397f2da08f. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./eng/scripts/automation_init.sh ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	generator automation-v2 ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateInput.json ../../../../../azure-sdk-for-go_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️sdk/resourcemanager/redhatopenshift/armredhatopenshift [Preview SDK Changes]
️❌ azure-resource-manager-schemas failed [Detail]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • Code Generator Failed in generating from 8d7fcc4c314ced925bfb7bbe6f5796397f2da08f. Schema Automation 14.0.0
    command	.sdkauto/initScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Submodule 'bicep-types-az' (https://github.com/Azure/bicep-types-az) registered for path 'bicep-types-az'
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Cloning into '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/bicep-types-az'...
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Submodule 'bicep-types' (https://github.com/Azure/bicep-types) registered for path 'bicep-types-az/bicep-types'
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] Cloning into '/mnt/vss/_work/1/s/azure-resource-manager-schemas/bicep-types-az/bicep-types'...
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice New minor version of npm available! 10.7.0 -> 10.8.2
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice Changelog: https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.8.2
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice To update run: npm install -g npm@10.8.2
    cmderr	[initScript.sh] npm notice
    error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/initScript.sh
    warn	Warning: File azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/initOutput.json not found to read. Please re-run the pipeline if the error is transitient error or report this issue through https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
    command	.sdkauto/generateScript.sh ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-resource-manager-schemas_tmp/generateOutput.json
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] /mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/ts-node@9.0.0_typescript@5.3.3/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     return new TSError(diagnosticText, diagnosticCodes)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]            ^
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] TSError: ⨯ Unable to compile TypeScript:
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(6,20): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'colors' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(10,19): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'yargs' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(11,18): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'path' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(13,35): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'fs' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(14,23): error TS2307: Cannot find module 'strip-ansi' or its corresponding type declarations.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(42,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(53,9): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(69,67): error TS7006: Parameter 'x' implicitly has an 'any' type.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(70,49): error TS7006: Parameter 'f' implicitly has an 'any' type.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(94,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(105,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(106,21): error TS2584: Cannot find name 'console'. Do you need to change your target library? Try changing the 'lib' compiler option to include 'dom'.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh] cmd/generateall.ts(157,13): error TS2591: Cannot find name 'process'. Do you need to install type definitions for node? Try `npm i --save-dev @types/node` and then add 'node' to the types field in your tsconfig.
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at createTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/ts-node@9.0.0_typescript@5.3.3/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:500:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at reportTSError (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/ts-node@9.0.0_typescript@5.3.3/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:504:19)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at getOutput (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/ts-node@9.0.0_typescript@5.3.3/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:739:36)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/ts-node@9.0.0_typescript@5.3.3/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:955:32)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module.m._compile (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/ts-node@9.0.0_typescript@5.3.3/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1043:43)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module._extensions..js (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1422:10)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Object.require.extensions.<computed> [as .ts] (/mnt/vss/_work/1/a/unified-pipeline-runtime/common/temp/node_modules/.pnpm/ts-node@9.0.0_typescript@5.3.3/node_modules/ts-node/src/index.ts:1046:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Module.load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1203:32)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Function.Module._load (node:internal/modules/cjs/loader:1019:12)
    cmderr	[generateScript.sh]     at Function.executeUserEntryPoint [as runMain] (node:internal/modules/run_main:128:12)
    error	Script return with result [failed] code [1] signal [null] cwd [azure-resource-manager-schemas]: .sdkauto/generateScript.sh
    warn	Warning: Package processing is skipped as the SDK generation fails. Please look into the above generation errors or report this issue through https://aka.ms/azsdk/support/specreview-channel.
️️✔️ azure-powershell succeeded [Detail] [Expand]
    For more instructions, please refer to the FAQ .
  • ️✔️Succeeded in generating from 8d7fcc4c314ced925bfb7bbe6f5796397f2da08f. SDK Automation 14.0.0
    command	sh ./tools/SwaggerCI/init.sh ../azure-powershell_tmp/initInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/initOutput.json
    command	pwsh ./tools/SwaggerCI/psci.ps1 ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateInput.json ../azure-powershell_tmp/generateOutput.json
  • ️✔️Az.redhatopenshift.DefaultTag [Preview SDK Changes]
Posted by Swagger Pipeline | How to fix these errors?

Copy link

openapi-pipeline-app bot commented Jul 2, 2024

@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Author

/azp run

Copy link

Commenter does not have sufficient privileges for PR 29671 in repo Azure/azure-rest-api-specs

@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview removed the BreakingChangeReviewRequired <valid label in PR review process>add this label when breaking change review is required label Jul 26, 2024
@cadenmarchese cadenmarchese marked this pull request as ready for review July 26, 2024 19:04
@AzureRestAPISpecReview AzureRestAPISpecReview added ARMReview new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required labels Jul 26, 2024
@ms-bogdan-rotaru
Copy link

The first commit needs to be an exact copy of the previous API version. All new changes should only be added in the subsequent commits.
This allows the reviewer to get a clear understanding of the actual changes being introduced. With the way the PR is raised now, it is not possible for the reviewer to tell what the changes are. Please either abandon the PR and raise another one with the recommendation or create a new set of commits on this PR following the recommendation. If you are doing the pattern please indicate which commit is the exact copy of the previous version.

@ms-bogdan-rotaru ms-bogdan-rotaru added the ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review label Jul 29, 2024
@openapi-pipeline-app openapi-pipeline-app bot removed the WaitForARMFeedback <valid label in PR review process> add this label when ARM review is required label Jul 29, 2024
@cadenmarchese
Copy link
Author

@ms-bogdan-rotaru hi, thanks for your review. I've opened #30004 which has the commits ordered in that way. The API changes should be visible between the first and second commits. I'll close this PR in favor of that one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ARMChangesRequested <valid label in PR review process>add this label when require changes after ARM review ARMReview new-api-version ReadyForApiTest <valid label in PR review process>add this label when swagger and service APIs are ready for test resource-manager
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants