-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 569
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat!: ama #968
feat!: ama #968
Conversation
Hi @matt-FFFFFF thank you for this initiative! We could have something link this in the file resources.management.tf
And something link this in the file locals.management.tf
|
Hi @JamesDLD Thank you for your thorough work here! For the initial release we are implementing the DCRs that are identical to the one published by the product teams. You will be able to override the policy parameters and supply your own DCRs if you wish, however the DCRs should be created outside the module. We may incorporate your changes in a future release to add more flexibility, however I am mindful of the complexity of the input schema required for the variables. |
Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com>
Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com>
Apologies @JamesDLD I misread this - I will incorporate what you have done into this PR Thanks again! |
Thanks!! |
Co-authored-by: Matt White <16320656+matt-FFFFFF@users.noreply.github.com>
/azp run unit |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
@jaredfholgate this is ready to go now I think |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nothing that would stop a release here, all just minor comments. LGTM :)
/azp run unit |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
/azp run unit |
1 similar comment
/azp run unit |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
1 similar comment
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, just a couple of comments.
/azp run unit |
Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
* feat(connectivity): Add option to set allow_non_virtual_wan_traffic in express route gateway. (Azure#914) Co-authored-by: Miltos Tsatsakis <m.tsatsakis@kaizengaming.com> * updates to resolve issue Azure#794 (Azure#919) Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com> * docs: update docs for threat_intelligence_allowlist (Azure#928) * Update wiki-sync.yml * chore(deps): bump github/super-linter from 5 to 6 (Azure#931) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * add link to Upgrade guide from v4.2.0 to v5.0.0 (Azure#934) Co-authored-by: Matt White <16320656+matt-FFFFFF@users.noreply.github.com> * Added hub_routing_preference to connectivity advanced configuration (Azure#930) * Policy sync updates (Azure#959) * Update Library Templates (automated) (Azure#966) Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com> * Add remote branch option (Azure#970) * Update Library Templates (automated) (Azure#973) Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com> * Update Library Templates (automated) (Azure#976) Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com> * Remove redundant assignment file (Azure#977) * updating threat intelligence allowlist dynamic block (Azure#953) Co-authored-by: Matt White <16320656+matt-FFFFFF@users.noreply.github.com> * chore(deps): bump azure/powershell from 1 to 2 (Azure#917) Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> * Add OpenSFF Scorecard (Azure#987) * chore(deps): bump github/codeql-action from 3.24.9 to 3.25.8 (Azure#990) * chore(deps): bump github.com/hashicorp/go-getter from 1.7.3 to 1.7.4 in /tests/terratest (Azure#986) * feat!: ama (Azure#968) * Fix example uami issue (Azure#1000) * Update Library Templates (automated) (Azure#1001) Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com> * docs: additional v6 upgrade detail (Azure#1002) * Update Library Templates (automated) (Azure#1006) Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com> * docs: update docs with FAQ on roadmap and banner for upcoming breaking changes (Azure#1008) * naming fixed in module --------- Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com> Co-authored-by: Mtsa <miltsatsakis@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Miltos Tsatsakis <m.tsatsakis@kaizengaming.com> Co-authored-by: Adam Tuckwell <106317528+ATuckwell@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: github-actions <action@github.com> Co-authored-by: Jared Holgate <jaredholgate@microsoft.com> Co-authored-by: dependabot[bot] <49699333+dependabot[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Tobias <tobias-m99@gmx.de> Co-authored-by: Matt White <16320656+matt-FFFFFF@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: QBY-MarkusMaring <106068259+QBY-MarkusMaring@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: cae-pr-creator[bot] <126156663+cae-pr-creator[bot]@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Daan Toes <112694691+cndaan@users.noreply.github.com>
@@ -1484,7 +1494,8 @@ locals { | |||
azure_synapse_analytics_dev = ["privatelink.dev.azuresynapse.net"] | |||
azure_synapse_analytics_sql = ["privatelink.sql.azuresynapse.net"] | |||
azure_synapse_studio = ["privatelink.azuresynapse.net"] | |||
azure_web_apps_sites = ["privatelink.azurewebsites.net"] | |||
azure_virtual_desktop = ["privatelink.wvd.microsoft.com"] | |||
azure_web_apps_sites = ["privatelink.azurewebsites.net", "scm.privatelink.azurewebsites.net"] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi, does this introduces a Breaking Change? Checking our current deployment, all scm records are automatically added to the "privatelink.azurewebsites.net" private DNS Zone. Introducing the scm subdomain as its own zone, would probably brake the current recordsets? I did not dare testing is :D
Checking the Docs and several github issues, there is no clear approach on whether to deploy or not the deploy "scm" as a separate zone.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes it does break it, SCM stopped resolving any IP since that zone is empty. I have tested it, please remove it or allow us to override it somehow.
Overview/Summary
This will be in the next major release, following the update of Azure Landing Zones with it's major policy refresh and move to Azure Monitoring Agent from Microsoft Monitoring Agent.
Incorporates the following changes from upstream
Changes from our awesome community
3.107.0
1.13.1
1.7.0
var.configure_management_resources
schema change, removing legacy components and adding support for AMA resourcesAcknowledgements
Thanks to:
Thanks to:
Testing Evidence
Please provide any testing evidence to show that your Pull Request works/fixes as described and planned (include screenshots, if appropriate).
As part of this Pull Request I have
main
branch