Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/integ specs views #8

Merged
merged 28 commits into from
Sep 14, 2023
Merged

Feature/integ specs views #8

merged 28 commits into from
Sep 14, 2023

Conversation

Benawi
Copy link
Owner

@Benawi Benawi commented Sep 13, 2023

Implemented Features

General requirements

Ruby requirements

Project requirements

  • Make sure that the N+1 problem is solved when fetching all posts and their comments for a user.

    • include the screenshots of your app's logs before and after the fix

    • before
      before

    • after
      after
      -[x] Integration specs

      • Use Capybara to write integration tests for each view in your project.
        test resu

Copy link

@t-yanick t-yanick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

STATUS: CHANGES REQUIRED

Hi @Benawi ,

Good job so far!

To Highlight! 👏 🟢

✔️ Collaborative work 👍 Commits from both team members
✔️ Screenshots of N + 1 solution attached to PR description
✔️ Has Capybara gem in Gemfile for integration test
✔️ Most test cases added

There are some issues that you still need to work on to go to the next project but you are almost there!

Required Changes ♻️

Check the comments under the review.

Optional suggestions

Every comment with the [OPTIONAL] prefix is not crucial enough to stop the approval of this PR. However, I strongly recommend you to take them into account as they can make your code better.

You can also consider:

  • N/A

Cheers and Happy coding!👏👏👏

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have a limited number of reviews per project (check the exact number in your Dashboard). If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@@ -47,14 +38,4 @@
it 'Pagination' do
expect(page).to have_button('Pagination')
end

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Great job working on this milestone. You are currently missing the test that redirects to the post's show page when you click on a post.

it 'displays each post with relevant information' do
@posts = user.posts

@posts.each do |post|
expect(page).to have_content(post.title)

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • You are currently missing:
  • Test that asserts you can see the number of posts the user has written.
  • Test that asserts you can see a post's title.
  • Test that asserts you can see some of the post's body.
    Kindly add the missing tests

)
end
visit user_posts_path(user)
end

it 'displays user profile information' do

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • You are currently missing the following tests:
  • Test that asserts you can see the user's profile picture.
  • Test that asserts you can see the user's username.
    Kindly add these missing test cases

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
require 'rails_helper'

RSpec.describe 'Post show page', type: :feature do
let!(:user) { User.create(name: 'Sarkodie', photo: '/path/to/photo1.jpg', post_counter: 10) }
let!(:user) { User.create(name: 'Sarkodie', photo: 'https://unsplash.com/photos/F_-0BxGuVvo', posts_counter: 10) }
let!(:post) do
Post.create(

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • At the moment you are missing the test that asserts that you can see who wrote the post. Kindly add it.

@@ -25,12 +25,6 @@
end
end

it 'displays the number of posts each user has written' do

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • You are currently missing the following test:
  • Test that asserts you can see the number of posts each user has written.
    Kindly add the missing test case

@Benawi
Copy link
Owner Author

Benawi commented Sep 14, 2023

Changes

  • Add test cases for redirects to the post's show page when you click on a post
  • Issues(already written before)fixed related to
    - Test that asserts you can see the number of posts the user has written.
    - Test that asserts you can see a post's title.
    - Test that asserts you can see some of the post's body
    - Test that asserts that you can see who wrote the post.
    - Test that asserts you can see the number of posts each user has written.

image
image

Copy link

@tufoinnkuo10 tufoinnkuo10 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Status: Approved ✔️

Hi @Benawi

Your project is complete! Great job for making the requested changes🥇. There is nothing else to say other than... it's time to merge it 🍾🚢 :shipit: . Congratulations! 🎉💯🌟

Good Points 👍

✔️Descriptive Pull Request
✔️ Screenshots of N + 1 solution attached to PR description
✔️ Has Capybara gem in Gemfile for integration test
✔️ test cases added
✔️No linter errors


Cheers..Happy coding!..and keep soaring higher! 💻 🍷 🚀

Feel free to leave any questions or comments in the PR thread if something is not 100% clear.
Please, remember to tag me in your question so I can receive the notification.

Please, do not open a new Pull Request for re-reviews. You should use the same Pull Request submitted for the first review, either valid or invalid unless it is requested otherwise.


As described in the Code reviews limits policy you have 2 more limited reviews per this project. If you think that the code review was not fair, you can request a second opinion using this form.

@Benawi Benawi merged commit 284d121 into develop Sep 14, 2023
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants