Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove simulated data from tip 4 and change tip 5 to focus on reproducibility #269

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Oct 20, 2020

Conversation

Benjamin-Lee
Copy link
Owner

@Benjamin-Lee Benjamin-Lee commented Oct 17, 2020

Did you add yourself as a contributor if this is your first contribution?

  • Yes, I added myself or am already a contributor

Any more details?

This PR addressed two issues:

  1. The data simulation part of tip 4 is awkward, both in content and style.
  2. Tip 4 had some reproducibility stuff that I thought should be in tip 5.

When addressing (2), I noticed that Tip 5 was really about reproducibility, especially since we talk about training complexity in the first tip now. I also saw this paper (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2766-y) earlier today, which made me think we should address code sharing as distinct from data sharing.

@Benjamin-Lee
Copy link
Owner Author

Also, I removed a paragraph which is essentially links to three different rules.

@cgreene
Copy link
Collaborator

cgreene commented Oct 18, 2020

Changes look good to me. I can't remember where that simulation ended up coming from initially but it has been moved all over the full manuscript. Maybe it's rule 11, which doesn't quite make a ten simple rules list :)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants