Install the git-lfs extension to support large files before cloning this repo (https://git-lfs.github.com/).
1) Questionnaire file. This file describes questions for the predictors. The questions are the same as those questions in the surveys or assessment instruments used to create the predictive algorithms. Also included are the allowed responses and response skip patterns.
The question file is a LimeSurvey survey template (.lss and .csv). https://www.limesurvey.org
2) Algorithm file. This file describes the method to calculate the risk of the outcome, based on the predictors from the questionnaire file.
The algorithm files are Predictive Modelling Markup Language (PMML 4.1) documents (.xml). http://dmg.org
Individual algorithms may have additional reference files. These files are described in the README within each algorithm folder.
Examples of additional files include:
1) Re-calibration data - These data ensure algorithms provide well-calibrated estimates in different settings.[1]
There are two types of calibration data:
-
Population distribution of the predictors - All algorithms within this repository are developed by centring predictive risks within the development data. Following, the algorithms are calibrated by centring all predictors in the new application data. Centring is performed using data that describes the distribution of the predictors in the application population. A person with the average (mean) predictor exposure has a hazard of 1 for that predictor. A theorectical person with the average (mean) exposure for all predictors would have a predictive risk that is equal to the observed (mean) risk for the entire population.
Population distribution data include predictive risks for percentile of risk exposure. Calibration data may also include distibution of predictors across age, sex or other subgroups.
Population distribution data are stored as CSV or JSON files and can be identified by the term "distribution" in the title of the data file.
-
Population outcome - Algorithms are calibrated to the population outcome, stratifyied by age and sex. Calibration ensures that the predictive risk is equal to the observed risk in the application setting. To perform calibration, the risk algorithm is applied to a population-based sample to generate predictive estimates of population risk. The predicted population risk is compared to the observed population risk, with a corresponding adjustment made to the baseline hazard (for example see HAdj in Table S7 of reference [1]).
Population outcome data include age and sex-stratefied risk of outcome, but may also include additional subgroups.
Please feel free to add calibration tables for different settings, or contact the algorithm development teams if you are interested in calibrating algorithms for your setting.
2) Algorithm development files - The files contain code that was used to develop the algorithm or reference documents. For example, algorithms may contain the R databox code used to derive predictive risks from the original development data. This R code can facilitate development, validation or calibration studies.
3) Algorithm testing data - These data can be use to test whether a scoring engine is performing correct calculations. Each row in a CSV file contains values for each predictor in an algorithm, along with the score or algorithm outcome. The data can be used for other purposes, such as creating or testing new algorithm development. Unless specifically identifyied, the algorthim testing data should not be used for calbiration because these data are not representitive of an actual application population.
Testing data are stored as CSV or JSON files and can be identified by the term "test" in the title of the data file.
There several approaches to calculate risk using the provided documents:
1) The predictive algorithm parameters within the PMML files can be transcribed into all common programming languages or even used within spreadsheet programs such as MS Excel or Google Sheets.
2) PMML can also be used within specifically-designed calculation or scoring engines such as http://openscoring.io or https://zementis.com.
3) We have an API to perform calculations based on the PMML files within this repository. API documentation. For example, see Heart and Stroke Foundation’s eHealth Risk Assessment. APIs provide additional outcome measures and features. For example, the MPoRT algorithm main outcome is 1-year risk, but also provided are:
- life expectancy;
- survival to specified age ("Will you live to see it?);
- health age (users age compared to a reference population).
All health outcome measures can be estimated considering the effect of:
- health behaviours (smoking, alcohol, diet and exercise);
- health interventions; and,
- external risks not included in the original algorithm (e.g. the effect of air pollution on life expectancy (see ProjectBigLife.ca).
Please contact dmanuel@ohri.ca for more information about connecting to our API.
4) Individual risk calculations can be performed at https://projectbiglife.ca.
We welcome suggestions to improve algorithm documentation or implementation of the risk tools. Feel free to open a new issue, pull request.
However, please note that normal copyright law applies and prevents the further copying, publication or distribution of our work without our permission. We’d be happy to collaborate and allow your use of our algorithm for academic research projects by not-for-profit entities, but if you’re a for-profit or otherwise wanting to reproduce all or part of our work for commercial purposes, please seek our permission first.
We also welcome collaborations for future development, validation, calibration or application of the risk tools. Contact Doug Manuel at dmanuel@ohri.ca
Cardiovascular Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT). CVDPoRT is currently under development. The protocol has been published: trial registration number NCT02267447 at ClinicalTrials.gov or reference.[1][2]
Dementia Population Risk Tool (DemPoRT). DemPoRT is currently under development. The protocol has been published: trial registration number NCT03155815 at ClinicalTrials.gov or reference.[3]
High Resource Use Population Risk Tool (HRUPoRT). A predictive algoirthm for the transtion to high health care use (top 5% of health care user) over a 5-year period. Developed and valdiated 2005 to 2010 Canadian Community Health Surveys invdually linked to health care use and cost in Ontario. Predictors are self-reported clincal, sociodemographic and health behaviours.
Mortality Population Risk Tool (MPoRT). A predictive algorithm for the calculation of 5-year risk of dying from all-causes. Developed and validated using the 2001 to 2008 Canadian Community Health Surveys (CCHS) with approximately 1 million person-years of follow-up and 9,900 deaths. Focus on health behaviours (smoking, diet, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption). The model is currently calibrated for Canada, 2013, with provisions to calibrate to other countries.[4]
Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-life in the Community Tool - End-of-life (RESPECT-EOL). A predictive algorithm for the risk of dying from all causes. The study base is all community-dwelling Ontarians who received home care from 2007 to 2015. There were 488,636 participants with 836,012 assessments and 298,657 deaths in the combined derivation and calibration cohort. The primary outcome is median survival time with 25th to 75th survival percentiles. Algorithm development was pre-specified and published (Trial registration NCT02779309) ClinicalTrials.gov or reference.[5]
Stroke Population Risk Tool (SPoRT). A predictive algorithm for the calculation of 5-year incident risk of major stroke (hospitalization or death). Developed and validated using the 2001 to 2008 Canadian Community Health Surveys (CCHS) with approximately 1 million person-years and 3 236 incident stroke events. Focus on health behaviours (smoking, diet, physical inactivity and alcohol consumption).[6]
-
Manuel DG, Tuna M, Bennett C, Hennessy D, Rosella L, Sanmartin C, Tu JV, Perez R, Fisher S, Taljaard M (2018) Development and validation of a cardiovascular disease risk-prediction model using population health surveys: the Cardiovascular Disease Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT). CMAJ 2018 Month X;190:E871-E882; DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.170914
-
Taljaard M, Tuna M, Bennett C, Perez R, Rosella L, Tu JV, et al. Cardiovascular Disease Population Risk Tool (CVDPoRT): predictive algorithm for assessing CVD risk in the community setting. A study protocol. BMJ open. 2014;4(10):e006701.
-
Fisher S, Hsu A, Mojaverian N, Taljaard M, Huyer G, Manuel DG, et al. Dementia Population Risk Tool (DemPoRT): study protocol for a predictive algorithm assessing dementia risk in the community. BMJ open. 2017;7(10).
-
Manuel DG, Perez R, Sanmartin C, Taljaard M, Hennessy D, Wilson K, et al. (2016) Measuring Burden of Unhealthy Behaviours Using a Multivariable Predictive Approach: Life Expectancy Lost in Canada Attributable to Smoking, Alcohol, Physical Inactivity, and Diet. PLoS Med 13(8): e1002082. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002082
-
Hsu AT, Manuel DG, Taljaard M, Chalifoux M, Bennett C, Costa AP, et al. Algorithm for predicting death among older adults in the home care setting: study protocol for the Risk Evaluation for Support: Predictions for Elder-life in the Community Tool (RESPECT). BMJ open. 2016;6(12)..
-
Manuel DG, Tuna M, Perez R, Tanuseputro P, Hennessy D, Bennett C, Rosella R, Sanmartin C, van Walraven C, Tu JV. Predicting Stroke Risk Based on Health Behaviours: Development of the Stroke Population Risk Tool (SPoRT). PloS One. 2015 Dec 4;10(12):e0143342. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0143342
Input
inputName: The name of the (Lime) web questionnaire for each exposure. For example, a Lime web questionnaire asks questions (inputs) for different types of physical activity (e.g. walking, running, biking).
Transformation
Transformation are steps between input and predictor. For example, different types of physical activity inputs (walking, running) are added together and summarized as weekly METS. The result of the transformation are values for the corresponding predictorName. For example, the different physical activity inputNames are summarized into activity_cont, the predictorName for physical activity within MPoRT and other risk algorithms.
inputName: The input for the transformation. The transformation inputName is the same as the input imputName.
newFeildName: Intermediate steps for the transformation. newFeildName provide values for predictorName, if transformation is required. (Example of mets..)
equation: The equation that transforms the values from the inputName to the values for the variableName.
Predictor
predictorName: The name of the beta coefficent in a risk algorithm. e.g. activity_cont is the predictorName for physical activity. The suffix _cont indicates that this predictor is a continous variable (e.g. METS or metabolic equivalents).
beta: the beta coeffecient for each predictorName.
referencePoint: The reference for the beta coefficient. The typical referencePoint for predictive algorithms in this repository is the population average for a predictorName within the development population. Using a 'centred' mean referencePoint facilitates recalibration in different populations. Alternative referencePoints may be available in the calibration tables. For example, the MPoRT algorithm was developed using Ontario, Canada, 2001 to 2007. The population average (mean) physical activity for males was 0.432 log METS. Of note, 10e0.432 = 2.7 METS, the averate weekly METS in the development cohort. The recommended physical activity in Canada and many other countries is 15 METs per week. Calibration to a new population should include referencePoint values that correspond to that new population.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
